Turner Caryn A, Stockinger Zsolt T, Gurney Jennifer M
From the Joint Trauma System (C.A.T., Z.T.S., J.M.G.), Joint Base San Antonio, Fort Sam Houston, TX.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jul;83(1):77-83. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001496.
Relatively few publications exist on surgical workload in the deployed military setting. This study analyzes US military combat surgical workload in Iraq and Afghanistan to gain a more thorough understanding of surgical training gaps and personnel requirements.
A retrospective analysis of the Department of Defense Trauma Registry was performed for all Role 2 (R2) and Role 3 (R3) military treatment facilities from January 2001 to May 2016. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes were grouped into 18 categories based on functional surgical skill sets. The 189,167 surgical procedures identified were stratified by role of care, month, and year. Percentiles were calculated for the number of procedures for each skill set. A literature search was performed for publications documenting combat surgical workload during the same period.
A total of 23,548 surgical procedures were performed at R2 facilities, while 165,619 surgical procedures were performed at R3 facilities. The most common surgical procedures performed overall were soft tissue (37.5%), orthopedic (13.84%), abdominal (13.01%), and vascular (6.53%). The least common surgical procedures performed overall were cardiac (0.23%), peripheral nervous system (0.53%), and spine (0.34%).Mean surgical workload at any point in time clearly underrepresented those units in highly kinetic areas, at times by an order of magnitude or more. The published literature always demonstrated workloads well in excess of the 50th percentile for the relevant time period.
The published literature on combat surgical workload represents the high end of the spectrum of deployed surgical experience. These trends in surgical workload provide vital information that can be used to determine the manpower needs of future conflicts in ever-changing operational tempo environments. Our findings provide surgical types and surgical workload requirements that will be useful in surgical training and placement of medical assets in future conflicts.
Epidemiologic study, level III; Care management, level III.
关于部署在军事环境中的外科手术工作量的出版物相对较少。本研究分析了美国军队在伊拉克和阿富汗的战斗外科手术工作量,以更全面地了解外科手术训练差距和人员需求。
对2001年1月至2016年5月期间所有二级(R2)和三级(R3)军事治疗设施的国防部创伤登记处进行回顾性分析。国际疾病分类第九版临床修订版程序代码根据功能性外科技能组分为18类。确定的189,167例外科手术按护理角色、月份和年份进行分层。计算每个技能组手术例数的百分位数。对记录同期战斗外科手术工作量的出版物进行文献检索。
R2设施共进行了23,548例外科手术,而R3设施进行了165,619例外科手术。总体上最常见的外科手术是软组织手术(37.5%)、骨科手术(13.84%)、腹部手术(13.01%)和血管手术(6.53%)。总体上最不常见的外科手术是心脏手术(0.23%)、周围神经系统手术(0.53%)和脊柱手术(0.34%)。在任何时间点的平均外科手术工作量明显低估了高动态地区的那些单位,有时相差一个数量级或更多。已发表的文献总是表明工作量远超过相关时间段的第50百分位数。
关于战斗外科手术工作量的已发表文献代表了部署外科手术经验范围的高端。这些外科手术工作量趋势提供了重要信息,可用于确定在不断变化的行动节奏环境中未来冲突的人力需求。我们的研究结果提供了外科手术类型和外科手术工作量要求,这将有助于未来冲突中的外科手术训练和医疗资源配置。
流行病学研究,三级;护理管理,三级。