Noback Peter C, Lombardi Joseph M, Seetharaman Mani, Lee Donald H, Strauch Robert J, Rosenwasser Melvin P
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trauma Training Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Vanderbilt Orthopedic Institute, Hand and Upper-Extremity Center, Medical Center East, Nashville, Tennessee.
J Wrist Surg. 2017 May;6(2):126-133. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593612. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is the most commonly used instrument to assess outcomes of basal joint arthritis (BJA). However, the DASH is subject to influence by the entire upper extremity. This study aims to develop and validate a disease-specific questionnaire for BJA that would be more sensitive to changes in thumb function and pain, and correlate better with objective and subjective metrics. The thumb disability examination (TDX) was developed and 80 patients presenting with BJA at one of the two hospital-based hand clinics were enrolled in the validation study. At enrollment, subjects were given the TDX, DASH, and visual analog pain scale with activity (A-VAS) surveys. The strength was assessed. Patients receiving corticosteroid injection were seen for follow-up at 6 weeks and those who underwent surgery were seen between 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Both the groups were given the TDX, DASH, and A-VAS scales at follow-up. In total, 65 subjects were included in the analysis. Average TDX completion time was 134.3 seconds. The TDX correlated more strongly with A-VAS scores at baseline than the DASH, but less strongly with tip-pinch measures. The TDX was more responsive to injection and surgical treatments for BJA than the DASH, yielding a larger effect size and standardized response mean, and was the only instrument to significantly correlate with changes in A-VAS. The TDX is a reliable instrument for assessing BJA treatment outcomes. It bears less of a burden on patients, is more responsive to symptomatic changes, and correlates better with most objective and subjective measures than the DASH. II, diagnostic.
上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)问卷是评估拇指腕掌关节关节炎(BJA)疗效最常用的工具。然而,DASH会受到整个上肢的影响。本研究旨在开发并验证一种针对BJA的疾病特异性问卷,该问卷对拇指功能和疼痛变化更敏感,并且与客观和主观指标的相关性更好。我们开发了拇指功能障碍检查(TDX),并在两家医院的手部门诊之一招募了80例患有BJA的患者参与验证研究。在入组时,受试者接受了TDX、DASH以及活动时视觉模拟疼痛量表(A-VAS)调查。评估了肌力。接受皮质类固醇注射的患者在6周时进行随访,接受手术的患者在术后3至6个月进行随访。两组在随访时均接受TDX、DASH和A-VAS量表评估。总共65名受试者纳入分析。TDX平均完成时间为134.3秒。在基线时,TDX与A-VAS评分的相关性比DASH更强,但与捏力测量的相关性较弱。与DASH相比,TDX对BJA的注射和手术治疗反应更灵敏,产生更大的效应量和标准化反应均值,并且是唯一与A-VAS变化显著相关的工具。TDX是评估BJA治疗效果的可靠工具。与DASH相比,它给患者带来的负担更小,对症状变化更敏感,并且与大多数客观和主观测量的相关性更好。II,诊断性。