Ahmed Osman M, O'Donnell Brian D, Gallagher Anthony G, Shorten George D
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University College Cork and Cork University Hospital.
The ASSERT Center, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 Apr 5;8:257-263. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S128963. eCollection 2017.
Change in the landscape of medical education coupled with a paradigm shift toward outcome-based training mandates the trainee to demonstrate specific predefined performance benchmarks in order to progress through training. A valid and reliable assessment tool is a prerequisite for this process. The objective of this study was to characterize ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block to develop performance and error metrics and to verify face and content validity using a modified Delphi method.
A metric group (MG) was established, which comprised three expert regional anesthesiologists, an experimental psychologist and a trained facilitator. The MG deconstructed ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block to identify and define performance and error metrics. Experts reviewed five video recordings of the procedure performed by anesthesiologists with different levels of expertise to aid task deconstruction. Subsequently, the MG subjected the metrics to "stress testing", a process to ascertain the extent to which the performance and error metrics could be scored objectively, either occurring or not occurring with a high degree of reliability. Ten experienced regional anesthesiologists used a modified Delphi method to reach consensus on the metrics.
Fifty-four performance metrics, organized in six procedural phases and characterizing ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block and 32 error metrics (nine categorized as critical) were identified and defined. Based on the Delphi panel consensus, one performance metric was modified, six deleted and three added.
In this study, we characterized ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block to develop performance and error metrics as a prerequisite for outcome-based training and assessment. Delphi consensus verified face and content validity.
医学教育格局的变化以及向基于结果的培训的范式转变要求受训者展示特定的预定义表现基准,以便在培训中取得进展。有效的评估工具是这一过程的先决条件。本研究的目的是对超声引导下腋路臂丛神经阻滞进行特征描述,以制定表现和错误指标,并使用改良的德尔菲法验证表面效度和内容效度。
成立了一个指标小组(MG),其中包括三位区域麻醉专家、一位实验心理学家和一位经过培训的协调员。该小组对超声引导下腋路臂丛神经阻滞进行解构,以识别和定义表现及错误指标。专家们查看了由不同专业水平的麻醉医生进行该操作的五段视频记录,以辅助任务解构。随后,该小组对这些指标进行“压力测试”,这是一个确定表现和错误指标在多大程度上能够被客观评分的过程,无论其是否发生都具有高度的可靠性。十位经验丰富的区域麻醉医生使用改良的德尔菲法就这些指标达成共识。
确定并定义了54项表现指标,分为六个操作阶段,用于描述超声引导下腋路臂丛神经阻滞,以及32项错误指标(其中九项被归类为关键指标)。根据德尔菲小组的共识,一项表现指标被修改,六项被删除,三项被添加。
在本研究中,我们对超声引导下腋路臂丛神经阻滞进行了特征描述,以制定表现和错误指标,作为基于结果的培训和评估之前提。德尔菲共识验证了表面效度和内容效度。