Melero Y, Oliver M K, Lambin X
School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
CREAF, Cerdanyola del Vallés, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Mol Ecol. 2017 Aug;26(15):4059-4071. doi: 10.1111/mec.14154. Epub 2017 May 21.
Estimating dispersal-a key parameter for population ecology and management-is notoriously difficult. The use of pedigree assignments, aided by likelihood-based software, has become popular to estimate dispersal rate and distance. However, the partial sampling of populations may produce false assignments. Further, it is unknown how the accuracy of assignment is affected by the genealogical relationships of individuals and is reflected by software-derived assignment probabilities. Inspired by a project managing invasive American mink (Neovison vison), we estimated individual dispersal distances using inferred pairwise relationships of culled individuals. Additionally, we simulated scenarios to investigate the accuracy of pairwise inferences. Estimates of dispersal distance varied greatly when derived from different inferred pairwise relationships, with mother-offspring relationship being the shortest (average = 21 km) and the most accurate. Pairs assigned as maternal half-siblings were inaccurate, with 64%-97% falsely assigned, implying that estimates for these relationships in the wild population were unreliable. The false assignment rate was unrelated to the software-derived assignment probabilities at high dispersal rates. Assignments were more accurate when the inferred parents were older and immigrants and when dispersal rates between subpopulations were low (1% and 2%). Using 30 instead of 15 loci increased pairwise reliability, but half-sibling assignments were still inaccurate (>59% falsely assigned). The most reliable approach when using inferred pairwise relationships in polygamous species would be not to use half-sibling relationship types. Our simulation approach provides guidance for the application of pedigree inferences under partial sampling and is applicable to other systems where pedigree assignments are used for ecological inference.
估计扩散——种群生态学和管理中的一个关键参数——是出了名的困难。借助基于似然性的软件进行系谱分配,已成为估计扩散率和距离的常用方法。然而,种群的部分抽样可能会产生错误的分配。此外,尚不清楚个体的谱系关系如何影响分配的准确性,以及软件得出的分配概率如何反映这一点。受一个管理入侵性美洲水貂(Neovison vison)项目的启发,我们利用被扑杀个体的推断成对关系来估计个体扩散距离。此外,我们模拟了各种情景来研究成对推断的准确性。当从不同的推断成对关系得出扩散距离估计值时,其差异很大,其中母子关系的扩散距离最短(平均 = 21公里)且最准确。被判定为母系半同胞的配对不准确,错误分配率为64% - 97%,这意味着对野生种群中这些关系的估计不可靠。在高扩散率情况下,错误分配率与软件得出的分配概率无关。当推断的亲本年龄较大且为移民,以及亚种群之间的扩散率较低(1%和2%)时,分配更为准确。使用30个而非15个基因座可提高成对可靠性,但半同胞分配仍然不准确(错误分配率>59%)。在一夫多妻制物种中使用推断成对关系时,最可靠的方法是不使用半同胞关系类型。我们的模拟方法为部分抽样下系谱推断的应用提供了指导,并且适用于其他使用系谱分配进行生态推断的系统。