Suppr超能文献

传统艾灸与无烟艾灸治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

Comparison of the efficacy between conventional moxibustion and smoke-free moxibustion on knee osteoarthritis: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Zhu Lin-Lin, Zhou Jian-Ying, Luo Ling, Wang Xiang, Peng Jia-Xi, Chen Sha-Sha, Yin Hai-Yan, Wu Qiao-Feng, Zhang Cheng-Shun, Lv Peng, Tang Yong, Yu Shu-Guang

机构信息

Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Trials. 2017 Apr 24;18(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1846-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conventional moxibustion is a representative non-drug intervention in traditional Chinese medicine, and it has been reported to produce encouraging results and benefits in relieving symptoms and improving the quality of life for patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in previous clinical trials and systematic reviews. Given that increasing concerns on the safety of generated smoke from conventional moxibustion have received much attention, smoke-free moxibustion is regarded as a potential alternative. However, whether smoke-free moxibustion would display a similar efficacy to that of conventional moxibustion still remains unclear. Therefore, this randomized controlled trial attempts to investigate the difference of efficacy between conventional moxibustion and smoke-free moxibustion in patients with KOA.

METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded, parallel-group clinical trial. A total of 138 eligible participants with KOA will be randomly allocated to two groups (conventional moxibustion group and smoke-free moxibustion group) in seven hospitals in China. Participants will receive 12 sessions of moxibustion treatment at three acupoints (EX-LE4, ST35, and ST36) over a period of 4 weeks (3 sessions per week). A smoke-removing device is placed at the top of the moxibustion device for the smoke-free moxibustion group (n = 69), while the conventional moxibustion group (n = 69) is treated with traditional moxibustion. The primary outcome measure will be the change of the global scale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) from the baseline to 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes include the visual analog scale VASand Patient Global Assessment scores. Follow-up measurements will be performed on the 8th and 12th weeks after random allocation.

DISCUSSION

This study will contribute to providing a solid foundation for the selection of moxibustion in clinical application as well as future research in moxibustion therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02772055 . Registered on 12 May 2016.

摘要

背景

传统艾灸是中医中一种具有代表性的非药物干预手段,在以往的临床试验和系统评价中,其在缓解症状和改善膝骨关节炎(KOA)患者生活质量方面取得了令人鼓舞的效果。鉴于人们对传统艾灸产生烟雾的安全性日益关注,无烟艾灸被视为一种潜在的替代方法。然而,无烟艾灸是否能展现出与传统艾灸相似的疗效仍不明确。因此,本随机对照试验旨在探究传统艾灸与无烟艾灸对KOA患者疗效的差异。

方法/设计:这是一项多中心、随机、单盲、平行组临床试验。在中国的七家医院,共有138名符合条件的KOA参与者将被随机分配到两组(传统艾灸组和无烟艾灸组)。参与者将在4周内(每周3次)在三个穴位(犊鼻、足三里、阴陵泉)接受12次艾灸治疗。无烟艾灸组(n = 69)在艾灸装置顶部放置一个排烟装置,而传统艾灸组(n = 69)采用传统艾灸治疗。主要结局指标将是从基线到4周时西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)总体评分的变化。次要结局包括视觉模拟评分(VAS)和患者总体评估得分。随机分组后第8周和第12周将进行随访测量。

讨论

本研究将为临床应用中艾灸的选择以及未来艾灸疗法的研究提供坚实基础。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02772055。于2016年5月12日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0239/5402673/58361ecf2407/13063_2017_1846_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验