Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Sep;20(3):343-347. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2017.22. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
While older age is associated with higher tumor grade, it is unknown whether comorbid disease burden has a similar, independent association. We sought to evaluate the impact of comorbid disease burden on tumor grade at diagnosis as indicated by biopsy Gleason score.
We conducted an observational cohort study of 1260 men newly diagnosed with non-metastatic prostate cancer from 1998 to 2004 at two Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Multivariable ordinal and multinomial logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between Charlson Comorbidity Index score and biopsy Gleason score.
Men with Charlson scores of 2 (odds ratio (OR) 1.8, P<0.001) and 3+ (OR 1.8, P<0.001) had significantly greater odds of higher Gleason scores, compared with men with Charlson scores of 0. In a multinomial logistic regression model predicting Gleason 7 vs ⩾6, only men with Charlson scores of 2 (OR 1.6, P=0.01) had greater odds of having a Gleason 7 tumor, compared with those with Charlson scores of 0. In a multinomial logistic regression model predicting Gleason 8-10 vs ⩽6, those with Charlson scores of 1 (OR 1.6, P=0.047), 2 (OR 2.8, P=0.01) and 3+ (OR 2.9, P=0.001) had higher odds of having a Gleason 8-10 tumor.
Moderate-to-heavy comorbid disease burden at diagnosis may be associated with high tumor grade, independent of age, and is a stronger predictor of Gleason 8-10 than Gleason 7 disease.
虽然年龄较大与肿瘤分级较高相关,但尚不清楚合并症疾病负担是否具有类似的独立相关性。我们试图评估合并症疾病负担对活检 Gleason 评分所指示的诊断时肿瘤分级的影响。
我们对 1998 年至 2004 年在两个退伍军人事务医疗中心新诊断为非转移性前列腺癌的 1260 名男性进行了一项观察性队列研究。使用多变量有序和多项逻辑回归来评估 Charlson 合并症指数评分与活检 Gleason 评分之间的关联。
与 Charlson 评分为 0 的男性相比,Charlson 评分为 2(优势比 (OR) 1.8,P<0.001)和 3+(OR 1.8,P<0.001)的男性具有更高的 Gleason 评分的可能性显著更高。在预测 Gleason 7 与 ⩾6 的多项逻辑回归模型中,只有 Charlson 评分为 2 的男性(OR 1.6,P=0.01)具有更高的可能性患有 Gleason 7 肿瘤,而 Charlson 评分为 0 的男性则没有。在预测 Gleason 8-10 与 ⩽6 的多项逻辑回归模型中,Charlson 评分为 1(OR 1.6,P=0.047)、2(OR 2.8,P=0.01)和 3+(OR 2.9,P=0.001)的男性具有更高的可能性患有 Gleason 8-10 肿瘤。
诊断时中度至重度合并症疾病负担可能与高肿瘤分级相关,独立于年龄,并且是 Gleason 8-10 肿瘤的预测因素,强于 Gleason 7 疾病。