Alhammoud Abduljabbar, Alkhalili Kenan, Hannallah Jack, Ibeche Bashar, Bajammal Sohail, Baco Abdul Moeen
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Department of Surgery, Cairo University School of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.
Asian Spine J. 2017 Apr;11(2):319-327. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.2.319. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
This study aimed to assess driving reaction times (DRTs) after spinal surgery to establish a timeframe for safe resumption of driving by the patient postoperatively. The MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases were analyzed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) Statement for clinical studies that investigated changes in DRTs following cervical and lumbar spinal surgery. Changes in DRTs and patients' clinical presentation, pathology, anatomical level affected, number of spinal levels involved, type of intervention, pain level, and driving skills were assessed. The literature search identified 12 studies that investigated postoperative DRTs. Six studies met the inclusion criteria; five studies assessed changes in DRT after lumbar spine surgery and two studies after cervical spina surgery. The spinal procedures were selective nerve root block, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, and lumbar fusion and/ordecompression. DRTs exhibited variable responses to spinal surgery and depended on the patients' clinical presentation, spinal level involved, and type of procedure performed. The evidence regarding the patients' ability to resume safe driving after spinal surgery is scarce. Normalization of DRT or a return of DRT to pre-spinal intervention level is a widely accepted indicator for safe driving, with variable levels of statistical significance owing to multiple confounding factors. Considerations of the type of spinal intervention, pain level, opioid consumption, and cognitive function should be factored in the assessment of a patient's ability to safely resume driving.
本研究旨在评估脊柱手术后的驾驶反应时间(DRT),以确定患者术后安全恢复驾驶的时间范围。根据PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)声明,对MEDLINE和谷歌学术数据库进行了分析,以查找调查颈椎和腰椎脊柱手术后DRT变化的临床研究。评估了DRT的变化以及患者的临床表现、病理情况、受影响的解剖部位、涉及的脊柱节段数量、干预类型、疼痛程度和驾驶技能。文献检索确定了12项调查术后DRT的研究。6项研究符合纳入标准;5项研究评估了腰椎手术后DRT的变化,2项研究评估了颈椎手术后DRT的变化。脊柱手术包括选择性神经根阻滞、颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术以及腰椎融合和/或减压术。DRT对脊柱手术表现出不同的反应,这取决于患者的临床表现、受累脊柱节段以及所进行的手术类型。关于患者脊柱手术后恢复安全驾驶能力的证据很少。DRT正常化或恢复到脊柱干预前水平是安全驾驶的一个广泛接受的指标,但由于多种混杂因素,其统计学意义水平各不相同。在评估患者安全恢复驾驶的能力时,应考虑脊柱干预类型、疼痛程度、阿片类药物使用情况和认知功能等因素。