Chehimi J, Peppard J, Emanuel D
Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1987 Dec;2(4):395-402.
In an attempt to select an i.v. immune globulin to be used for the immunoprophylaxis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in recipients of allogeneic bone marrow transplants, we conducted an in vitro comparison of three newly available commercial i.v. immune globulins with two CMV hyperimmune globulin products shown to be efficacious in previous CMV immunoprophylaxis studies. We compared these products for both CMV immunoreactive antibody titer by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and for in vitro functional activity by virus neutralization using both standard laboratory and wild clinical isolates of CMV. All five products had high titers of CMV-specific IgG when assayed by ELISA, ranging from 1:1600 to 1:25,600; the two hyperimmune products had the highest titers as expected. However, both hyperimmune products, despite having much higher CMV-IgG titers by ELISA, had CMV neutralizing antibody titers only equivalent to those found in two of the three standard i.v. immune globulin products tested (mean of 1:500-1:1000). One of the three commercial immune globulins tested had a lower mean neutralizing antibody titer in lots assayed compared to the other products (mean of 1:50). There was thus no direct or predictable correlation in any of the products tested between the quantity of CMV-IgG as measured by ELISA and in vitro functional activity as measured by virus neutralization. We also noted marked variation between different lots of the same product in all three commercially available immune globulin products. To insure that both current and future CMV immunoprophylaxis trials are standardized, the quantity as well as the functional activity of CMV-specific antibodies in products used need to be determined.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
为了选择一种静脉注射免疫球蛋白用于异基因骨髓移植受者巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染的免疫预防,我们对三种新上市的商用静脉注射免疫球蛋白与两种在先前CMV免疫预防研究中已证明有效的CMV高效价免疫球蛋白产品进行了体外比较。我们通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)比较了这些产品的CMV免疫反应性抗体滴度,并通过使用CMV的标准实验室分离株和野生临床分离株进行病毒中和来比较其体外功能活性。通过ELISA检测,所有五种产品的CMV特异性IgG滴度都很高,范围从1:1600到1:25600;正如预期的那样,两种高效价产品的滴度最高。然而,尽管两种高效价产品通过ELISA检测的CMV-IgG滴度要高得多,但其CMV中和抗体滴度仅相当于所测试的三种标准静脉注射免疫球蛋白产品中的两种(平均值为1:500 - 1:1000)。所测试的三种商用免疫球蛋白中的一种,与其他产品相比,在所检测的批次中平均中和抗体滴度较低(平均值为1:50)。因此,在所测试的任何产品中,通过ELISA测量的CMV-IgG数量与通过病毒中和测量的体外功能活性之间没有直接或可预测的相关性。我们还注意到,在所有三种市售免疫球蛋白产品中,同一产品的不同批次之间存在显著差异。为确保当前和未来的CMV免疫预防试验标准化,需要确定所用产品中CMV特异性抗体的数量及其功能活性。(摘要截短为250字)