Townsend J, Piper M, Frank A O, Dyer S, North W R, Meade T W
Medical Research Council, Epidemiology, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex.
BMJ. 1988;297(6647):544-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6647.544.
To compare a community support scheme using care attendants with standard aftercare for their effects on independence and morale of elderly patients discharged from hospital and on their use of health and social services.
Randomised controlled study of cohort of patients over 75 discharged to their own homes.
District general hospital and community.
Total of 903 patients (mean age 82, 25% over 85).
Total of 464 patients received support from care attendants on first day at home and for up to 12 hours a week for two weeks. Support comprised practical care, help with rehabilitation, and organising social help. The remaining 439 patients received standard aftercare.
Difference between two groups of 7% in hospital readmission rates or one point on activities of daily living scale (power 80%, significance level 5%).
Three months after the initial discharge 763 patients were interviewed (84%). There were no significant differences between the two groups in physical independence (activities of daily living scale), in measures of morale (Philadelphia scale), or in death rates. Hospital readmission rates within 18 months of discharge, however, were significantly higher in the control group and they spent more days in hospital (mean; control group 30.6 days, support group 17.1 days; p = 0.014). Of the patients living alone who were followed up for 18 months 21 (15%) receiving standard aftercare were readmitted more than twice compared with 6 (5%) supported by care attendants (p less than 0.01).
If the findings are confirmed, and the policy extended to all patients over the age of 75 living alone, an average health district might expect either to save about 23 hospital beds at a net annual saving of about pounds 220,000 in the short term or to increase available beds by this number.
比较使用护理员的社区支持方案与标准出院后护理对出院老年患者独立性和士气以及他们对健康和社会服务利用情况的影响。
对75岁以上出院回家患者队列进行随机对照研究。
地区综合医院和社区。
共903例患者(平均年龄82岁,25%超过85岁)。
464例患者在回家第一天接受护理员支持,每周最多12小时,为期两周。支持包括实际护理、康复帮助和组织社会帮助。其余439例患者接受标准出院后护理。
两组住院再入院率相差7%或日常生活活动量表相差1分(检验效能80%,显著性水平5%)。
初次出院三个月后,对763例患者进行了访谈(84%)。两组在身体独立性(日常生活活动量表)、士气测量(费城量表)或死亡率方面无显著差异。然而,出院18个月内,对照组的住院再入院率显著更高,且住院天数更多(平均值;对照组30.6天,支持组17.1天;p = 0.014)。在随访18个月的独居患者中,接受标准出院后护理的21例(15%)再次入院超过两次,而接受护理员支持的为6例(5%)(p小于0.01)。
如果研究结果得到证实,并将该政策扩展到所有75岁以上的独居患者,一个普通健康区可能预计在短期内要么节省约23张病床,每年净节省约220,000英镑,要么增加同等数量的可用病床。