Suppr超能文献

建立有意义的基准:开发用于高级腹腔镜缝合的形成性反馈工具。

Establishing meaningful benchmarks: the development of a formative feedback tool for advanced laparoscopic suturing.

机构信息

Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Henry K.M. de Kuyper Education Center, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Ave, D6-257, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5057-5065. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5569-y. Epub 2017 Apr 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Time and accuracy are commonly used metrics to assess laparoscopic skills in a simulated environment. However, they do not provide trainees with meaningful information about how to improve their skills. The objective of this study was to provide preliminary validity evidence for the creation a formative feedback tool (FFT) for advanced laparoscopic suturing skills.

METHODS

Videotapes of senior surgical residents (PGY3-5; SRs) and minimally invasive surgeons (MIS) performing 3 advanced laparoscopic suturing tasks were analyzed: needle handling (NH), suturing under tension (UT), and continuous suturing (CS). A FFT was created based on a grounded theory analysis of interviews with MIS surgeons about the key technical aspects of each task. The FFT was used to assess the videotaped performances of SRs and MIS surgeons by two blinded independent raters.

RESULTS

The FFT is composed of three parts: NH contains 10 items, UT 18, and CS 20. Each item was classified according to seven key surgical principles: depth perception, safety, bimanual dexterity, exposure, tissue handling, instrument manipulation, and forward planning. The videotaped performance of SR and MIS surgeons was graded on a 3-point Likert scale ("does well," "needs some improvement," and "does poorly") and scores were calculated as a sum of the points. ICCs for all three tasks were high (NH 0.90, UT 0.87, and CS 0.90). FFT score correlated strongly with combined time and accuracy measurements for UT (0.82, p < 0.01) and CS (0.81, p < 0.01), and moderately for NH (0.65, p < 0.01). MIS surgeons performed significantly better than SRs on UT (p = 0.02) and CS (p = 0.05), while scores on NH were similar (p = 0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive tool for providing feedback about advanced laparoscopic suturing skills was developed. The FFT demonstrates evidence for validity as a measure of suturing skills and experience, and provides meaningful information to trainees about how to improve their skills and engage in more deliberate and efficient practice.

摘要

背景

在模拟环境中,时间和准确性通常被用作评估腹腔镜技能的指标。然而,它们并不能为学员提供有关如何提高技能的有意义的信息。本研究的目的是为创建一种用于评估高级腹腔镜缝合技能的形成性反馈工具(FFT)提供初步的有效性证据。

方法

分析了高级住院医师(PGY3-5;SR)和微创外科医生(MIS)执行 3 项高级腹腔镜缝合任务的视频:针处理(NH)、张力下缝合(UT)和连续缝合(CS)。根据对 MIS 外科医生关于每个任务关键技术方面的访谈进行的扎根理论分析,创建了 FFT。FFT 由两位盲目的独立评估者用于评估 SR 和 MIS 外科医生的录像表现。

结果

FFT 由三个部分组成:NH 包含 10 个项目,UT 包含 18 个项目,CS 包含 20 个项目。每个项目根据七个关键手术原则进行分类:深度感知、安全性、双手灵巧性、暴露、组织处理、器械操作和前瞻性规划。SR 和 MIS 外科医生的录像表现被评为 3 分李克特量表(“表现良好”、“需要改进”和“表现不佳”),分数计算为分数总和。所有三个任务的 ICC 均很高(NH 0.90,UT 0.87 和 CS 0.90)。FFT 评分与 UT(0.82,p<0.01)和 CS(0.81,p<0.01)的总时间和准确性测量结果高度相关,与 NH(0.65,p<0.01)的相关性适中。MIS 外科医生在 UT(p=0.02)和 CS(p=0.05)上的表现明显优于 SR,而 NH 的得分相似(p=0.57)。

结论

开发了一种用于提供高级腹腔镜缝合技能反馈的综合工具。FFT 作为一种衡量缝合技能和经验的指标,具有有效性的证据,并为学员提供有关如何提高技能并进行更刻意、更高效的实践的有意义的信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验