Lenoir Cédric, Huang Gan, Vandermeeren Yves, Hatem Samar Marie, Mouraux André
Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
NeuroModulation Unit, Neurology Department, CHU UCL Namur (Godinne), Université catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium.
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Jul 1;118(1):317-330. doi: 10.1152/jn.00615.2016. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
The role of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) in vibrotaction is well established. In contrast, its involvement in nociception is still debated. Here we test whether S1 is similarly involved in the processing of nonnociceptive and nociceptive somatosensory input in humans by comparing the aftereffects of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) of S1 on the event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by nonnociceptive and nociceptive somatosensory stimuli delivered to the ipsilateral and contralateral hands. Cathodal HD-tDCS significantly affected the responses to nonnociceptive somatosensory stimuli delivered to the contralateral hand: both early-latency ERPs from within S1 (N20 wave elicited by transcutaneous electrical stimulation of median nerve) and late-latency ERPs elicited outside S1 (N120 wave elicited by short-lasting mechanical vibrations delivered to index fingertip, thought to originate from bilateral operculo-insular and cingulate cortices). These results support the notion that S1 constitutes an obligatory relay for the cortical processing of nonnociceptive tactile input originating from the contralateral hemibody. Contrasting with this asymmetric effect of HD-tDCS on the responses to nonnociceptive somatosensory input, HD-tDCS over the sensorimotor cortex led to a bilateral and symmetric reduction of the magnitude of the N240 wave of nociceptive laser-evoked potentials elicited by stimulation of the hand dorsum. Taken together, our results demonstrate in humans a differential involvement of S1 in vibrotaction and nociception. Whereas the role of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) in vibrotaction is well established, its involvement in nociception remains strongly debated. By assessing, in healthy volunteers, the effect of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation over S1, we demonstrate a differential involvement of S1 in vibrotaction and nociception.
初级体感皮层(S1)在振动觉中的作用已得到充分证实。相比之下,其在痛觉中的作用仍存在争议。在此,我们通过比较对S1进行高清经颅直流电刺激(HD-tDCS)后,对同侧和对侧手部施加非伤害性和伤害性体感刺激所诱发的事件相关电位(ERP),来测试S1在人类非伤害性和伤害性体感输入处理中是否有类似的参与。阴极HD-tDCS显著影响了对对侧手部施加的非伤害性体感刺激的反应:来自S1内部的早期潜伏期ERP(正中神经经皮电刺激诱发的N20波)和S1外部诱发的晚期潜伏期ERP(食指指尖短暂机械振动诱发的N120波,被认为起源于双侧岛盖-岛叶和扣带回皮层)。这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即S1构成了对来自对侧半侧身体的非伤害性触觉输入进行皮层处理的必要中继站。与HD-tDCS对非伤害性体感输入反应的这种不对称效应形成对比的是,感觉运动皮层上的HD-tDCS导致刺激手背诱发的伤害性激光诱发电位的N240波幅值出现双侧对称降低。综上所述,我们的结果表明,在人类中,S1在振动觉和痛觉中的参与存在差异。虽然初级体感皮层(S1)在振动觉中的作用已得到充分证实,但其在痛觉中的作用仍存在激烈争议。通过评估健康志愿者中对S1进行高清经颅直流电刺激的效果,我们证明了S1在振动觉和痛觉中的参与存在差异。