Kim Sang-Won, Noh O Kyu, Kim Ji Hun, Chun Mison, Oh Young-Taek, Kang Seok Yun, Lee Hyun Woo, Park Rae Woong, Yoon Dukyong
Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017 Jun;79(6):1161-1167. doi: 10.1007/s00280-017-3312-y. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
We aimed to present the clinical outcomes of adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with low-dose daily cisplatin regimen compared to the conventional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based regimen for extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EHBDC).
From October 1994 to April 2013, 41 patients received adjuvant CCRT with low-dose daily regimen or 5-FU-based regimens. Nineteen patients received low-dose of cisplatin just before every delivery of radiation therapy, and 21 patients received two cycles of 5-FU-based regimen during radiotherapy. We compared the clinical outcomes between two adjuvant CCRT regimens.
Adjuvant CCRT with low-dose daily cisplatin showed comparable toxicity profiles compared with that of a 5-FU-based regimen. The median follow-up time was 33 months (range, 5-205), and the 5-year overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 34.2, 50.8, and 49.7%, respectively. Univariable analyses showed no significant differences in OS, LRRFS, and DMFS between the groups with two regimens. In multivariable analyses, chemotherapeutic regimen was a significant prognostic factor for OS, favoring the low-dose daily cisplatin regimen (HR = 2.491, p = 0.036) over 5-FU-based regimen, though not for LRRFS (p = 0.642) and DMFS (p = 0.756).
Adjuvant CCRT with low-dose daily cisplatin regimen showed acceptable toxicities and survivals compared to those of the 5-FU-based regimen. Low-dose daily cisplatin can be one of the feasible regimens for adjuvant CCRT for EHBDC.
我们旨在呈现与基于传统5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)方案相比,采用低剂量每日顺铂方案辅助同步放化疗(CCRT)治疗肝外胆管癌(EHBDC)的临床结果。
1994年10月至2013年4月,41例患者接受了低剂量每日方案或基于5-FU方案的辅助CCRT。19例患者在每次放疗前接受低剂量顺铂,21例患者在放疗期间接受两个周期的基于5-FU的方案。我们比较了两种辅助CCRT方案的临床结果。
与基于5-FU的方案相比,低剂量每日顺铂辅助CCRT显示出相当的毒性特征。中位随访时间为33个月(范围5-205个月),5年总生存率(OS)、局部区域无复发生存率(LRRFS)和远处转移无复发生存率(DMFS)分别为34.2%、50.8%和49.7%。单因素分析显示,两组方案在OS、LRRFS和DMFS方面无显著差异。在多因素分析中,化疗方案是OS的一个显著预后因素,低剂量每日顺铂方案优于基于5-FU的方案(HR = 2.491,p = 0.036),但在LRRFS(p = 0.642)和DMFS(p = 0.756)方面并非如此。
与基于5-FU的方案相比,低剂量每日顺铂方案辅助CCRT显示出可接受的毒性和生存率。低剂量每日顺铂可以是EHBDC辅助CCRT的可行方案之一。