Suppr超能文献

水生暴露是否可以解释新烟碱类污染的植物材料在水生系统中引起的影响?

Does Waterborne Exposure Explain Effects Caused by Neonicotinoid-Contaminated Plant Material in Aquatic Systems?

机构信息

Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Koblenz-Landau , Landau Campus, Fortstrasse 7, 76829 Landau, Germany.

Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences , Lennart Hjelms väg 9, SWE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2017 May 16;51(10):5793-5802. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b00827. Epub 2017 May 3.

Abstract

Neonicotinoids are increasingly applied on trees as protection measure against insect pests. Consequently, neonicotinoids are inevitably transferred into aquatic environments either via spray drift or surface runoff or (due to neonicotinoids' systemic nature) via senescent leaves. There particularly leaf-shredding invertebrates may be exposed to neonicotinoids through both the water phase and the consumption of contaminated leaves. In 7 day bioassays (n = 30), we examined ecotoxicological differences between these two exposure scenarios for an amphipod and an insect nymph with their feeding rate as the response variable. Organisms either experienced waterborne neonicotinoid (i.e., imidacloprid, thiacloprid, and acetamiprid) exposure only or a combined exposure (waterborne and dietary) through both the consumption of contaminated leaves and neonicotinoids leaching from leaves into water. The amphipod (7 day ECs from 0.3 to 8.4 μg/L) was more sensitive than the insect nymph (7 day ECs from 7.0 to 19.4 μg/L). Moreover, for both species, concentration-response models derived from water concentrations indicated higher effects under the combined exposure. Together with the observed inability of shredders to avoid neonicotinoid-contaminated leaves, our results emphasize the relevance of dietary exposure (e.g., via leaves) for systemic insecticides. Thus, it would be prudent to consider dietary exposure during the registration of systemic insecticides to safeguard ecosystem integrity.

摘要

新烟碱类杀虫剂越来越多地被应用于树木,作为防治虫害的保护措施。因此,新烟碱类杀虫剂不可避免地通过喷雾漂移、地表径流或(由于新烟碱类杀虫剂的系统性)通过衰老叶片转移到水生环境中。特别是叶片破碎的无脊椎动物可能通过水相和受污染叶片的摄入而接触到新烟碱类杀虫剂。在 7 天生物测定中(n = 30),我们以摄食率为响应变量,研究了两种暴露情景(一种是节肢动物和昆虫若虫,另一种是通过摄入受污染叶片和叶片中渗出的新烟碱类杀虫剂的复合暴露)对两种节肢动物的生态毒理学差异。生物要么仅经历新烟碱类杀虫剂(即吡虫啉、噻虫啉和噻虫胺)的水相暴露,要么通过摄入受污染叶片和新烟碱类杀虫剂从叶片渗出到水中的复合暴露。与昆虫若虫(7 天 ECs 为 7.0 至 19.4μg/L)相比,节肢动物(7 天 ECs 为 0.3 至 8.4μg/L)更为敏感。此外,对于这两个物种,从水浓度得出的浓度-反应模型表明,在复合暴露下,效果更高。结合观察到的叶片破碎者无法避免接触到受新烟碱类杀虫剂污染的叶片,我们的结果强调了饮食暴露(例如通过叶片)对系统性杀虫剂的重要性。因此,在登记系统性杀虫剂时,考虑饮食暴露以保护生态系统完整性是谨慎的做法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验