• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用一种新方法估计的总动脉顺应性与左心室质量的相关性优于主动脉脉搏波速度:SAFAR 研究。

Total arterial compliance, estimated by a novel method, is better related to left ventricular mass compared to aortic pulse wave velocity: The SAFAR study.

机构信息

a Biomedical Engineering Unit, 1st Department of Cardiology , "Hippokration" Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens , Athens , Greece.

b Cardiovascular Prevention & Research Unit, Department of Pathophysiology, Medical School , National and Kapodistrian University of Athens , Athens , Greece.

出版信息

Clin Exp Hypertens. 2017;39(3):271-276. doi: 10.1080/10641963.2016.1247165.

DOI:10.1080/10641963.2016.1247165
PMID:28448191
Abstract

The investigation of the association between total arterial compliance (C)-estimated by a novel technique-with left ventricular mass (LVM) and hypertrophy (LVH). Our hypothesis was that C may be better related to LVM compared to the gold-standard regional aortic stiffness. Within the frame of the ongoing cross-sectional study "SAFAR," 226 subjects with established hypertension or with suspected hypertension underwent blood pressure (BP) assessment, carotid-to-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV), and echocardiographic measurement of LVM. LVM index (LVMI) was calculated by the ratio of LVM to body surface area. C was estimated by a previously proposed and validated formula: C = 36.7 /cf-PWV [ml/mmHg]. LVMI was related to age (r = 0.207, p = 0.002), systolic BP (r = 0.248, p < 0.001), diastolic BP (r = 0.139, p = 0.04), mean BP (r = 0.212, p = 0.002), pulse pressure (r = 0.212, p = 0.002), heart rate (r = -0.172, p = 0.011), cf-PWV (r = 0.268, p < 0.001), and C (r = -0.317, p < 0.001). The highest correlation was observed for C that was significantly stronger than the respective correlation of cf-PWV (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, C was a stronger determinant, compared to cf-PWV, of LVMI and LVH. It remains to be further explored whether C has also a superior prognostic value beyond and above local or regional (segmental) estimates of pulse wave velocity.

摘要

研究一种新方法估计的总动脉顺应性(C)与左心室质量(LVM)和肥厚(LVH)之间的关系。我们的假设是,C 可能与 LVM 的相关性优于金标准的区域性主动脉僵硬度。在正在进行的横断面研究“SAFAR”中,226 名已确诊高血压或疑似高血压的患者接受了血压(BP)评估、颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度(cf-PWV)和超声心动图测量的 LVM。LVM 指数(LVMI)通过 LVM 与体表面积的比值计算。C 通过之前提出并验证的公式估计:C = 36.7 / cf-PWV [ml/mmHg]。LVMI 与年龄(r = 0.207,p = 0.002)、收缩压(r = 0.248,p < 0.001)、舒张压(r = 0.139,p = 0.04)、平均血压(r = 0.212,p = 0.002)、脉压(r = 0.212,p = 0.002)、心率(r = -0.172,p = 0.011)、cf-PWV(r = 0.268,p < 0.001)和 C(r = -0.317,p < 0.001)相关。相关性最高的是 C,其相关性明显强于 cf-PWV(p < 0.001)。在多元分析中,C 是 LVM 和 LVH 的决定因素,与 cf-PWV 相比具有更强的相关性。C 是否具有优于局部或区域性(节段性)脉搏波速度估计的预后价值,还有待进一步探索。

相似文献

1
Total arterial compliance, estimated by a novel method, is better related to left ventricular mass compared to aortic pulse wave velocity: The SAFAR study.采用一种新方法估计的总动脉顺应性与左心室质量的相关性优于主动脉脉搏波速度:SAFAR 研究。
Clin Exp Hypertens. 2017;39(3):271-276. doi: 10.1080/10641963.2016.1247165.
2
Enhanced radial late systolic pressure augmentation in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy.左心室肥厚的高血压患者晚期收缩期径向压力增强。
Am J Hypertens. 2006 Jan;19(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.06.017.
3
Cross-sectional association of volume, blood pressures, and aortic stiffness with left ventricular mass in incident hemodialysis patients: the Predictors of Arrhythmic and Cardiovascular Risk in End-Stage Renal Disease (PACE) study.新发血液透析患者中,容量、血压和主动脉僵硬度与左心室质量的横断面关联:终末期肾病心律失常和心血管风险预测因素(PACE)研究
BMC Nephrol. 2015 Aug 7;16:131. doi: 10.1186/s12882-015-0131-4.
4
Contributions of aortic pulse wave velocity and backward wave pressure to variations in left ventricular mass are independent of each other.主动脉脉搏波速度和逆向波压力对左心室质量变化的影响是相互独立的。
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2017 May;11(5):265-274.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
5
The Relationship of Carotid Arterial Stiffness and Left Ventricular Concentric Hypertrophy in Hypertension.高血压患者颈动脉僵硬度与左心室向心性肥厚的关系
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;25(2):263-72. doi: 10.17219/acem/34654.
6
Echo-Doppler assessment of arterial stiffness in pediatric patients with Kawasaki disease.超声多普勒评估川崎病患儿的动脉僵硬度。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013 Sep;26(9):1084-9. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 22.
7
Association between home arterial stiffness index and target organ damage in hypertension: comparison with pulse wave velocity and augmentation index.家庭动脉僵硬度指数与高血压靶器官损害的关系:与脉搏波速度和增强指数的比较。
Atherosclerosis. 2011 Dec;219(2):637-42. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.09.027. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
8
Association between wasted pressure effort and left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension: influence of arterial wave reflection.高血压患者中压力负荷与左心室肥厚的关联:动脉波反射的影响
Am J Hypertens. 2008 Mar;21(3):329-33. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2007.49. Epub 2008 Jan 17.
9
Relations between white coat effects and left ventricular mass index or arterial stiffness: role of nocturnal blood pressure dipping.白大褂效应与左心室质量指数或动脉僵硬度之间的关系:夜间血压下降的作用。
Am J Hypertens. 2013 Nov;26(11):1287-94. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpt108. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
10
Arterial pulsatile hemodynamic load induced by isometric exercise strongly predicts left ventricular mass in hypertension.等长运动引起的动脉脉动血流动力学负荷强烈预测高血压患者的左心室质量。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010 Feb;298(2):H320-30. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00334.2009. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between Mixed Heavy Metal Exposure and Arterial Stiffness, with Alkaline Phosphatase Identified as a Mediator.混合重金属暴露与动脉僵硬度之间的关联,其中碱性磷酸酶被确定为中介物。
Biol Trace Elem Res. 2024 Sep 2. doi: 10.1007/s12011-024-04359-2.
2
Associations of dietary patterns with blood pressure and markers of subclinical arterial damage in adults with risk factors for CVD.饮食模式与心血管疾病风险因素成年人的血压和亚临床动脉损伤标志物的相关性。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Dec;24(18):6075-6084. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021003499. Epub 2021 Aug 16.