Calder Peter R, Laubscher Maritz, Goodier W David
The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, Middlesex, UK.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
Injury. 2017 Jun;48 Suppl 1:S52-S58. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.028. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
Limb lengthening is now an accepted practice in orthopaedic surgery. The principles of distraction osteogenesis have become well established with the use of external fixators, utilizing both monolateral and ring fixators. Corticotomy technique, frame stability, lengthening rate and rhythm all contribute to the formation of bone regenerate and tissues. Complications are however common including pin-site infection, soft tissue tethering from the pins and wires resulting in pain, regenerate deformity from soft tissue forces or fracture following frame removal and patient intolerance of the frames during treatment. Surgical techniques have changed to try and minimise these complications. The use of intramedullary nails have been used in conjunction with an external fixator or inserted after lengthening has been achieved, to reduce fixator time and prevent regenerate deformity. Implant innovation has led to the production of intramedullary lengthening nails. The initial devices used ratchet mechanisms with rotation of the bone fragments to achieve lengthening (Bliskunov, Albizzia and ISKD). More accurate control of lengthening and a reduction in pain, resulting from the manual rotation of the leg required to achieve the ratchet progression, was achieved by the use of a transcutaneous electrical conduit powered by external high frequency electrical energy (Fitbone). The most recent implant uses an external remote controller which contains two neodymium magnets. These are placed over the nail on the skin and rotate which in turn rotates a third magnet within the intramedullary nail (Precice). This magnet rotation is converted by a motor to extend or retract the extendible rod. There are multiple nail sizes and lengths available, and early results have shown accurate control with few complications. With such promising outcomes the use of this lengthening intramedullary nail is now recommended as the implant of choice in femoral lengthening. This article is an historical account of the intramedullary device and the impact on limb lengthening.
肢体延长目前在骨科手术中是一种被认可的做法。随着外固定器的使用,牵张成骨的原理已得到充分确立,外固定器包括单侧和环形固定器。皮质切开术技术、框架稳定性、延长速率和节奏都有助于骨再生和组织的形成。然而,并发症很常见,包括针道感染、针和钢丝导致的软组织束缚引起疼痛、软组织力量导致的再生畸形或拆除框架后骨折以及治疗期间患者对框架不耐受。手术技术已经改变,试图尽量减少这些并发症。髓内钉已与外固定器联合使用,或在延长完成后插入,以减少固定器使用时间并防止再生畸形。植入物的创新导致了髓内延长钉的生产。最初的装置使用棘轮机制,通过骨碎片的旋转来实现延长(布利斯科诺夫、阿尔比齐亚和国际儿童骨科协会装置)。通过使用由外部高频电能驱动的经皮电导管(菲博恩装置),实现了对延长的更精确控制,并减少了因手动旋转腿部以实现棘轮推进而产生的疼痛。最新的植入物使用一个外部遥控器,其中包含两个钕磁铁。将这些磁铁放在皮肤上的钉子上方并旋转,进而使髓内钉内的第三个磁铁旋转(普雷西思装置)。这种磁铁旋转由电机转换,以伸展或缩回可伸缩杆。有多种钉子尺寸和长度可供选择,早期结果显示控制精确,并发症很少。鉴于如此有前景的结果,现在推荐使用这种延长髓内钉作为股骨延长的首选植入物。本文是对髓内装置及其对肢体延长影响的历史记述。