Department of Biology Teaching and Learning, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Department of Biology Teaching and Learning, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Summer;16(2). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-12-0352.
Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) for non-science majors (nonmajors) are potentially distinct from CUREs for developing scientists in their goals, learning objectives, and assessment strategies. While national calls to improve science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education have led to an increase in research revealing the positive effects of CUREs for science majors, less work has specifically examined whether nonmajors are impacted in the same way. To address this gap in our understanding, a working group focused on nonmajors CUREs was convened to discuss the following questions: 1) What are our laboratory-learning goals for nonmajors? 2) What are our research priorities to determine best practices for nonmajors CUREs? 3) How can we collaborate to define and disseminate best practices for nonmajors in CUREs? We defined three broad student outcomes of prime importance to the nonmajors CURE: improvement of scientific literacy skills, proscience attitudes, and evidence-based decision making. We evaluated the state of knowledge of best practices for nonmajors, and identified research priorities for the future. The report that follows is a summary of the conclusions and future directions from our discussion.
面向非科学专业学生的课程型本科研究经历(CURE)在目标、学习目标和评估策略方面与面向发展型科学家的 CURE 可能存在显著差异。虽然提高科学、技术、工程和数学教育的全国呼吁导致了越来越多的研究揭示了 CURE 对科学专业学生的积极影响,但很少有工作专门研究非专业学生是否以同样的方式受到影响。为了解决我们理解上的这一差距,一个专注于非专业学生 CURE 的工作组进行了讨论,以回答以下问题:1)我们的非专业学生实验室学习目标是什么?2)我们的研究重点是什么,以确定非专业学生 CURE 的最佳实践?3)我们如何合作来定义和传播非专业学生 CURE 的最佳实践?我们确定了对非专业学生 CURE 至关重要的三个广泛的学生成果:提高科学素养技能、支持科学的态度和基于证据的决策制定。我们评估了非专业学生最佳实践的知识现状,并确定了未来的研究重点。以下报告是我们讨论的结论和未来方向的摘要。