DiGioia Jonathan, Watkins Kari Edison, Xu Yanzhi, Rodgers Michael, Guensler Randall
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 790 Atlantic Drive, Atlanta, GA 30332-0355, United States.
J Safety Res. 2017 Jun;61:105-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
This paper takes a critical look at the present state of bicycle infrastructure treatment safety research, highlighting data needs. Safety literature relating to 22 bicycle treatments is examined, including findings, study methodologies, and data sources used in the studies. Some preliminary conclusions related to research efficacy are drawn from the available data and findings in the research.
While the current body of bicycle safety literature points toward some defensible conclusions regarding the safety and effectiveness of certain bicycle treatments, such as bike lanes and removal of on-street parking, the vast majority treatments are still in need of rigorous research. Fundamental questions arise regarding appropriate exposure measures, crash measures, and crash data sources.
This research will aid transportation departments with regard to decisions about bicycle infrastructure and guide future research efforts toward understanding safety impacts of bicycle infrastructure.
本文批判性地审视了自行车基础设施处理安全性研究的现状,突出了数据需求。对与22种自行车处理方式相关的安全文献进行了研究,包括研究结果、研究方法以及研究中使用的数据来源。从现有数据和研究结果中得出了一些与研究有效性相关的初步结论。
虽然当前的自行车安全文献对于某些自行车处理方式(如自行车道和取消路边停车)的安全性和有效性指向了一些合理的结论,但绝大多数处理方式仍需要进行严格的研究。在适当的暴露量度、碰撞量度和碰撞数据源方面出现了一些基本问题。
这项研究将有助于交通部门在自行车基础设施决策方面提供帮助,并指导未来的研究工作,以了解自行车基础设施的安全影响。