Suppr超能文献

食物不安全与心理健康状况:对 149 个国家的全球分析。

Food Insecurity and Mental Health Status: A Global Analysis of 149 Countries.

机构信息

Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2017 Aug;53(2):264-273. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Apr 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study sought to determine the association of individual-level food insecurity (FI) with mental health status across all global regions.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data were analyzed in 2016 from the 2014 Gallup World Poll, a series of globally implemented, nationally representative surveys. FI was assessed using the Food Insecurity Experience Scale Survey Module for Individuals, an eight-question psychometric scale reporting individuals' experiences of FI. Individual-level composite indices of mental health, the Negative Experience Index and Positive Experience Index (0-100 scale), were calculated based on responses to five questions of respondents' recent negative and positive experiences, respectively, associated with depression and mental distress.

RESULTS

The prevalence of any FI ranged from 18.3% in East Asia to 76.1% in Sub-Saharan Africa. In global analyses (149 countries) using adjusted multiple regression analyses, FI was associated in a dose-response fashion with poorer scores on the mental health indices (coefficient [95% CI]: Negative Experience Index: mild FI, 10.4 [9.5, 11.2]; moderate FI, 17.7 [16.4, 19.0]; severe FI, 24.5 [22.7, 26.3]; Positive Experience Index: mild FI, -8.3 [-9.3, -7.4]; moderate FI, -12.6 [-13.8, -11.3]; severe FI, -16.2 [-17.9, -14.5]). Within-region analyses (11 regions) consistently demonstrated the same trends.

CONCLUSIONS

FI is associated with poorer mental health and specific psychosocial stressors across global regions independent of SES. The numerous pathways via which FI may contribute to common mental disorders, and the broad social implications of FI linked to cultural norms and self-efficacy, may contribute to the cross-cultural consistency of the findings.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在确定个体层面的粮食不安全(FI)与所有全球区域的心理健康状况之间的关联。

方法

2016 年分析了 2014 年盖洛普世界民意调查的横断面数据,这是一系列在全球范围内实施的、具有国家代表性的调查。使用个体粮食不安全体验量表调查模块评估粮食不安全,这是一种八问题心理计量量表,报告个体的粮食不安全体验。基于受访者对五个问题的近期负面和正面经历的回答,计算了个体层面的心理健康综合指数,即负面体验指数和正面体验指数(0-100 量表),这两个指数分别与抑郁和精神困扰相关。

结果

任何形式的粮食不安全的患病率从东亚的 18.3%到撒哈拉以南非洲的 76.1%不等。在使用调整后的多元回归分析进行的全球分析(149 个国家)中,粮食不安全与心理健康指数得分较差呈剂量反应关系(系数[95%置信区间]:负面体验指数:轻度粮食不安全,10.4[9.5,11.2];中度粮食不安全,17.7[16.4,19.0];严重粮食不安全,24.5[22.7,26.3];正面体验指数:轻度粮食不安全,-8.3[-9.3,-7.4];中度粮食不安全,-12.6[-13.8,-11.3];严重粮食不安全,-16.2[-17.9,-14.5])。在区域内分析(11 个区域)中,始终呈现出相同的趋势。

结论

在独立于社会经济地位的情况下,粮食不安全与全球区域内的心理健康状况较差和特定的心理社会压力因素相关。粮食不安全可能通过多种途径导致常见精神障碍,并且与文化规范和自我效能相关的粮食不安全的广泛社会影响,可能导致研究结果具有跨文化一致性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验