Schelin Lina, Tengman Eva, Ryden Patrik, Häger Charlotte
Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Statistics, Umeå School of Business and Economics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2017 May 1;12(5):e0176247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176247. eCollection 2017.
Clinical test batteries for evaluation of knee function after injury to the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) should be valid and feasible, while reliably capturing the outcome of rehabilitation. There is currently a lack of consensus as to which of the many available assessment tools for knee function that should be included. The present aim was to use a statistical approach to investigate the contribution of frequently used tests to avoid redundancy, and filter them down to a proposed comprehensive and yet feasible test battery for long-term evaluation after ACL injury.
In total 48 outcome variables related to knee function, all potentially relevant for a long-term follow-up, were included from a cross-sectional study where 70 ACL-injured (17-28 years post injury) individuals were compared to 33 controls. Cluster analysis and logistic regression were used to group variables and identify an optimal test battery, from which a summarized estimator of knee function representing various functional aspects was derived.
As expected, several variables were strongly correlated, and the variables also fell into logical clusters with higher within-correlation (max ρ = 0.61) than between clusters (max ρ = 0.19). An extracted test battery with just four variables assessing one-leg balance, isokinetic knee extension strength and hop performance (one-leg hop, side hop) were mathematically combined to an estimator of knee function, which acceptably classified ACL-injured individuals and controls. This estimator, derived from objective measures, correlated significantly with self-reported function, e.g. Lysholm score (ρ = 0.66; p<0.001).
The proposed test battery, based on a solid statistical approach, includes assessments which are all clinically feasible, while also covering complementary aspects of knee function. Similar test batteries could be determined for earlier phases of ACL rehabilitation or to enable longitudinal monitoring. Such developments, established on a well-grounded consensus of measurements, would facilitate comparisons of studies and enable evidence-based rehabilitation.
用于评估前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤后膝关节功能的临床测试组合应具备有效性和可行性,同时能可靠地反映康复效果。目前,对于众多可用的膝关节功能评估工具中应包含哪些,尚无共识。当前的目标是采用一种统计方法来研究常用测试的作用,以避免冗余,并筛选出一套建议的全面且可行的测试组合,用于ACL损伤后的长期评估。
从一项横断面研究中纳入了总共48个与膝关节功能相关的结果变量,所有这些变量都可能与长期随访相关。在该研究中,将70名ACL损伤患者(损伤后17 - 28年)与33名对照组进行了比较。采用聚类分析和逻辑回归对变量进行分组,并确定最佳测试组合,从中得出一个代表膝关节各个功能方面的膝关节功能综合估计值。
正如预期的那样,几个变量之间存在强相关性,并且这些变量还形成了逻辑聚类,聚类内部的相关性(最大ρ = 0.61)高于聚类之间的相关性(最大ρ = 0.19)。提取出一个仅包含四个变量的测试组合,这些变量分别评估单腿平衡、等速膝关节伸展力量和跳跃性能(单腿跳、侧跳),并通过数学方法将其组合成一个膝关节功能估计值,该估计值能够较好地对ACL损伤患者和对照组进行分类。这个从客观测量得出的估计值与自我报告的功能,如Lysholm评分,显著相关(ρ = 0.66;p<0.001)。
基于可靠统计方法提出的测试组合,包含了所有临床可行的评估,同时也涵盖了膝关节功能的互补方面。对于ACL康复的早期阶段或进行纵向监测,可以确定类似的测试组合。基于对测量的充分共识而进行的此类发展,将有助于研究之间的比较,并实现基于证据的康复。