Lo Janice, Patel Preeti, Shultz James M, Ezard Nadine, Roberts Bayard
a ECOHOST - The Centre for Health and Social Change , The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , London , United Kingdom.
b Department of War Studies , King's College London , London , United Kingdom.
Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Sep 19;52(11):1494-1510. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1289411. Epub 2017 May 4.
There are currently over 55 million refugees and internally displaced persons due to armed conflict. In addition, there are around 150 million more conflict-affected residents who remain in their home communities. Armed conflict poses a number of potential risks for harmful alcohol use.
The objective of the study was to systematically examine evidence on harmful alcohol use among conflict-affected populations in low- and middle-income countries.
A systematic review methodology was used following PRISMA guidelines. Quantitative studies were selected with outcomes relating to harmful alcohol use among conflict-affected populations in low- and middle-income countries. Seven bibliographic databases and a range of gray literature sources were searched. Descriptive analysis was applied and a quality assessment conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale.
The search yielded 10,037 references of which 22 studies met inclusion criteria. Twenty-one of the studies used a cross-sectional design, and 1 used a case series design. Evidence on risk factors for harmful alcohol use was weak overall. Factors associated with harmful alcohol use were male gender, older age, cumulative trauma event exposure, and depression. There were no studies on the effectiveness of interventions for harmful alcohol use. The strength of evidence was also limited by the generally moderate quality of the studies.
Substantially more evidence is required to understand the scale of conflict-associated harmful alcohol use, key risk factors, association of alcohol use with physical and mental disorders, and effectiveness of interventions to address harmful alcohol use in conflict-affected populations.
目前,由于武装冲突,有超过5500万难民和境内流离失所者。此外,还有约1.5亿受冲突影响的居民留在其家乡社区。武装冲突对有害饮酒构成了一些潜在风险。
本研究的目的是系统审查低收入和中等收入国家受冲突影响人群中有害饮酒的证据。
按照PRISMA指南采用系统评价方法。选择了与低收入和中等收入国家受冲突影响人群中有害饮酒相关结果的定量研究。检索了七个文献数据库和一系列灰色文献来源。进行了描述性分析,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表进行了质量评估。
检索得到10037篇参考文献,其中22项研究符合纳入标准。21项研究采用横断面设计,1项采用病例系列设计。总体而言,有害饮酒风险因素的证据薄弱。与有害饮酒相关的因素有男性、年龄较大、累积创伤事件暴露和抑郁。没有关于有害饮酒干预措施有效性的研究。证据的强度也受到研究质量普遍中等的限制。
需要更多的证据来了解与冲突相关的有害饮酒的规模、关键风险因素、饮酒与身心障碍的关联以及解决受冲突影响人群有害饮酒问题的干预措施的有效性。