Wang Xingling, Du Mingze, Guan Yichun, Wang Bijun, Zhang Junwei, Liu Zihua
The Reproduction Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 7 Kangfuqian Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017 May 4;15(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12958-017-0255-4.
Comparative neonatal outcomes with respect to singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-state embryo transfers are controversial with respect to which method is superior. Many studies have yielded contradictory results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for the purpose of comparing neonatal outcomes in single births following IVF/ICSI.
We searched the Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials (CCTR) databases until October 2016. Studies and trials that contained neonatal outcomes for singleton births were included. Data were extracted in 2 × 2 tables. The analysis was performed using Rev Man 5.1 software. Risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences, with 95% confidence intervals, were calculated to assess the results of each outcome. Subgroups were applied in all outcomes. Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) checklists were used to assess the quality of the referenced studies.
Twelve studies met the criteria in this meta-analysis. There was a high risk of preterm birth after blastocyst embryo transfer versus the risk after cleavage-stage transfer (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01-1.22). For the "only fresh" subgroup, the outcome was coincident (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.06-1.27). For the "fresh and frozen" and "only frozen" subgroups, there were no differences. Patients who received fresh blastocyst embryo transfers had a high risk of very preterm births (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.02-1.31). Finally, cleavage-stage embryo transfers were associated with a high risk of infants who were small for gestational age (0.83, 95% CI: 0.76-0.92) and a low risk of those who were large for gestation age (1.14, 95% CI: 1.04-1.25).
The risks of preterm and very preterm births increased after fresh blastocyst transfers versus the risks after fresh cleavage-stage embryo transfers. However, in frozen embryo transfers, there were no differences. Blastocyst embryo transfers resulted in high risks of infants who were large for gestational age, and cleavage-stage embryo transfers resulted in high risks of infants who were small for gestational age.
关于囊胚移植或卵裂期胚胎移植单胎分娩的新生儿比较结局,哪种方法更优存在争议。许多研究得出了相互矛盾的结果。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射(IVF/ICSI)后单胎分娩的新生儿结局。
我们检索了截至2016年10月的Medline、Embase和Cochrane临床试验中央注册库(CCTR)数据库。纳入包含单胎分娩新生儿结局的研究和试验。数据以2×2表格形式提取。使用Rev Man 5.1软件进行分析。计算风险比(RRs)和风险差异及95%置信区间,以评估各结局的结果。所有结局均进行亚组分析。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)清单评估所引用研究的质量。
12项研究符合本荟萃分析的标准。与卵裂期移植后的风险相比,囊胚胚胎移植后早产风险较高(RR:1.11,95%CI:1.01 - 1.22)。对于“仅新鲜”亚组,结果一致(RR:1.16,95%CI:1.06 - 1.27)。对于“新鲜和冷冻”及“仅冷冻”亚组,无差异。接受新鲜囊胚胚胎移植的患者极早产风险较高(RR:1.16,95%CI:1.02 - 1.31)。最后,卵裂期胚胎移植与小于胎龄儿的高风险(0.83,95%CI:0.76 - 0.92)和大于胎龄儿的低风险(1.14,95%CI:1.04 - 1.25)相关。
与新鲜卵裂期胚胎移植后的风险相比,新鲜囊胚移植后早产和极早产风险增加。然而,在冷冻胚胎移植中,无差异。囊胚胚胎移植导致大于胎龄儿的高风险,而卵裂期胚胎移植导致小于胎龄儿的高风险。