Suppr超能文献

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中糖尿病与缺血性损伤的关系。

Relationship between diabetes and ischaemic injury among patients with revascularized ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, Medical Clinic II, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Dec;19(12):1706-1713. doi: 10.1111/dom.13002. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

Abstract

AIMS

Studies comparing reperfusion efficacy and myocardial damage between diabetic and non-diabetic patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are scarce and have reported conflicting results. The aim was to investigate the impact of preadmission diabetic status on myocardial salvage and damage as determined by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and to evaluate its prognostic relevance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 792 patients with STEMI at 8 sites. CMR core laboratory analysis was performed to determine infarct characteristics. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal re-infarction and new congestive heart failure, were recorded at 12 months. Patients were categorized according to preexisting diabetes mellitus (DM), and according to insulin-treated DM (ITDM) and non-insulin-treated DM (NITDM).

RESULTS

One-hundred and sixty (20%) patients had DM and 74 (9%) were insulin-treated. There was no difference in the myocardial salvage index, infarct size, microvascular obstruction and left ventricular ejection fraction between all patient groups (all P > .05). Patients with DM were at higher risk of MACE (11% vs 6%, P = .03) than non-DM patients. After stratification according to preadmission anti-diabetic therapy, MACE rate was comparable between NITDM and non-DM (P > .05), whereas the group of ITDM patients had significantly worse outcome (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetic patients with STEMI, especially those having ITDM, had an increased risk of MACE. The adverse clinical outcome was, however, not explained by an impact of DM on reperfusion success or myocardial damage. Clinical trial registry number: NCT00712101.

摘要

目的

比较糖尿病和非糖尿病 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者再灌注效果和心肌损伤的研究很少,且结果相互矛盾。本研究旨在通过心脏磁共振(CMR)评估糖尿病与心肌再灌注效果和损伤的相关性,并探讨其预后价值。

材料和方法

我们在 8 个中心纳入了 792 例 STEMI 患者。由核心实验室分析 CMR 以确定梗死特征。主要不良心脏事件(MACE)定义为全因死亡、非致死性再梗死和新发充血性心力衰竭的复合终点,于 12 个月时进行评估。根据患者是否患有糖尿病,分为糖尿病组和胰岛素治疗糖尿病组(ITDM)和非胰岛素治疗糖尿病组(NITDM)。

结果

160 例(20%)患者患有糖尿病,其中 74 例(9%)为胰岛素治疗。各组间心肌挽救指数、梗死面积、微血管阻塞和左心室射血分数均无差异(均 P >.05)。糖尿病患者的 MACE 发生率(11%比 6%,P =.03)高于非糖尿病患者。根据入院前抗糖尿病治疗进行分层后,NITDM 患者与非糖尿病患者的 MACE 发生率相当(P >.05),而 ITDM 患者的预后明显较差(P <.001)。

结论

STEMI 合并糖尿病患者,尤其是 ITDM 患者,MACE 风险增加。然而,糖尿病对再灌注效果和心肌损伤的影响并不能完全解释不良临床结局。临床试验注册号:NCT00712101。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验