Dickens Jonathan F, Owens Brett D, Cameron Kenneth L, DeBerardino Thomas M, Masini Brendan D, Peck Karen Y, Svoboda Steven J
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(8):1769-1775. doi: 10.1177/0363546517704184. Epub 2017 May 5.
There is no consensus on the optimal method of stabilization (arthroscopic or open) in collision athletes with anterior shoulder instability.
To examine the effect of "subcritical" bone loss and football-specific exposure on the rate of recurrent shoulder instability after arthroscopic stabilization in an intercollegiate American football population.
Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.
Fifty intercollegiate football players underwent primary arthroscopic stabilization for anterior shoulder instability and returned to football for at least a single season. Preoperatively, 32 patients experienced recurrent subluxations, and 18 patients experienced a single or recurrent dislocation. Shoulders with glenoid bone loss >20%, an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion, an off-track lesion, and concomitant rotator cuff repair were excluded from the study. The primary outcome of interest was the ability to return to football without subsequent instability. Patients were followed for time to a subsequent instability event after return to play using days of exposure to football and total follow-up time after arthroscopic stabilization.
Fifty consecutive patients returned to American football for a mean 1.5 seasons (range, 1-3) after arthroscopic stabilization. Three of 50 (6%; 95% CI, 1.3%-16.5%) patients experienced recurrent instability. There were no subsequent instability events after a mean 3.2 years of military service. All shoulders with glenoid bone loss >13.5% (n = 3) that underwent arthroscopic stabilization experienced recurrent instability upon returning to sport, while none of the shoulders with <13.5% glenoid bone loss (n = 47) sustained a recurrent instability event during football ( X = 15.80, P < .001). Shoulders with >13.5% glenoid bone loss had an incidence rate of 5.31 cases of recurrent instability per 1000 athlete-exposures of football. In 72,000 athlete-exposures to football with <13.5% glenoid bone loss, there was no recurrent instability. Significantly more anchors were used during the primary arthroscopic stabilization procedure in patients who experienced multiple preoperative instability events ( P = .005), and lesions spanned significantly more extensive portions along the circumference of the glenoid ( P = .001) compared with shoulders having a single preoperative instability event before surgical stabilization.
Arthroscopic stabilization of anterior shoulder instability in American football players with <13.5% glenoid bone loss provides reliable outcomes and low recurrence rates.
对于患有前肩不稳的碰撞类运动员,最佳的稳定方法(关节镜手术或开放手术)尚无共识。
在美国大学橄榄球运动员群体中,研究“亚临界”骨量丢失和橄榄球专项运动暴露对关节镜下稳定术后复发性肩不稳发生率的影响。
病例对照研究;证据等级,3级。
50名大学橄榄球运动员因前肩不稳接受了初次关节镜下稳定手术,并至少回归橄榄球运动一个赛季。术前,32例患者有复发性半脱位,18例患者有单次或复发性脱位。肩胛盂骨量丢失>20%、存在嵌顿性希尔-萨克斯损伤、脱轨损伤以及合并肩袖修复的肩部被排除在研究之外。主要关注的结果是能否在无后续不稳的情况下回归橄榄球运动。使用橄榄球运动暴露天数和关节镜下稳定术后的总随访时间,对患者回归运动后至后续不稳事件发生的时间进行随访。
50例患者在关节镜下稳定术后连续回归美式橄榄球运动,平均时长为1.5个赛季(范围1 - 3个赛季)。50例患者中有3例(6%;95%置信区间,1.3% - 16.5%)出现复发性不稳。平均服役3.2年后未再发生不稳事件。所有肩胛盂骨量丢失>13.5%(n = 3)且接受关节镜下稳定手术的肩部在回归运动后均出现复发性不稳,而肩胛盂骨量丢失<13.5%(n = 47)的肩部在橄榄球运动期间均未发生复发性不稳事件(X = 15.80,P <.001)。肩胛盂骨量丢失>13.5%的肩部每1000次运动员橄榄球运动暴露中复发性不稳的发生率为5.31例。在72000次运动员橄榄球运动暴露中,肩胛盂骨量丢失<13.5%的情况下未出现复发性不稳。与术前手术稳定前有单次不稳事件的肩部相比,术前有多次不稳事件的患者在初次关节镜下稳定手术过程中使用的锚钉显著更多(P =.005),且损伤沿肩胛盂圆周跨越的范围显著更广(P =.001)。
对于肩胛盂骨量丢失<13.5%的美国橄榄球运动员,关节镜下稳定前肩不稳可提供可靠的结果和较低的复发率。