Tosoian Jeffrey J, Chappidi Meera R, Bishoff Jay T, Freedland Stephen J, Reid Julia, Brawer Michael, Stone Steven, Schlomm Thorsten, Ross Ashley E
James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Intermountain Urological Institute, Intermountain Health Care, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
BJU Int. 2017 Dec;120(6):808-814. doi: 10.1111/bju.13911. Epub 2017 Jun 11.
To determine the prognostic utility of the cell cycle progression (CCP) score in men with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-defined low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP).
Men who underwent RP for Gleason score ≤6 PCa at three institutions (Martini Clinic [MC], Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center [DVA] and Intermountain Healthcare [IH]) were identified. The CCP score was obtained from diagnostic (DVA, IH) or simulated biopsies (MC). The primary outcome was biochemical recurrence (BCR; prostate-specific antigen ≥0.2 ng/mL) after RP. The prognostic utility of the CCP score was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models in the subset of men meeting NCCN low-risk criteria and in the overall cohort.
Among the 236 men identified, 80% (188/236) met the NCCN low-risk criteria. Five-year BCR-free survival for the low (<0), intermediate (0-1) and high (>1) CCP score groups was 89.2%, 80.4%, 64.7%, respectively, in the low-risk cohort (P = 0.03), and 85.9%, 79.1%, 63.1%, respectively, in the overall cohort (P = 0.041). In multivariable models adjusting for clinical and pathological variables with the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score, the CCP score was an independent predictor of BCR in the low-risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1.77 per unit score, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21, 2.58; P = 0.003) and overall cohorts (HR 1.41 per unit score, 95% CI 1.02, 1.96; P = 0.039).
In a cohort of men with NCCN-defined low-risk PCa, the CCP score improved clinical risk stratification of men who were at increased risk of BCR, which suggests the CCP score could improve the assessment of candidacy for active surveillance and guide optimum treatment selection in these patients with otherwise similar clinical characteristics.
确定细胞周期进程(CCP)评分在接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)定义的低风险前列腺癌(PCa)男性患者中的预后价值。
确定在三家机构(马蒂尼诊所[MC]、达勒姆退伍军人事务医疗中心[DVA]和山间医疗保健[IH])接受RP治疗的Gleason评分≤6的PCa男性患者。CCP评分来自诊断性活检(DVA、IH)或模拟活检(MC)。主要结局是RP术后的生化复发(BCR;前列腺特异性抗原≥0.2 ng/mL)。在符合NCCN低风险标准的男性亚组和整个队列中,使用Kaplan-Meier分析和多变量Cox比例风险模型评估CCP评分的预后价值。
在确定的236名男性中,80%(188/236)符合NCCN低风险标准。在低风险队列中,低(<0)、中(0 - 1)和高(>1)CCP评分组的5年无BCR生存率分别为89.2%、80.4%、64.7%(P = 0.03),在整个队列中分别为85.9%、79.1%、63.1%(P = 0.041)。在使用前列腺癌风险评估(CAPRA)评分对临床和病理变量进行调整的多变量模型中,CCP评分是低风险队列(风险比[HR]为每单位评分1.77,95%置信区间[CI]为1.21,2.58;P = 0.003)和整个队列中BCR的独立预测因子(HR为每单位评分1.41,95%CI为1.02,1.96;P = 0.039)。
在一组NCCN定义的低风险PCa男性患者中,CCP评分改善了BCR风险增加男性的临床风险分层,这表明CCP评分可以改善对主动监测候选资格的评估,并指导这些具有相似临床特征患者的最佳治疗选择。