• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

旨在解决变应性真菌性鼻-鼻窦炎定义争议的研究。

Study toward resolving the controversy over the definition of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis.

作者信息

Barac Aleksandra, Stevanovic Goran, Pekmezovic Marina, Rakocevic Zoran, Stosovic Rajica, Erovic Boban, Tomic Spiric Vesna

机构信息

Clinic for Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.

School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Med Mycol. 2018 Feb 1;56(2):162-171. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myx032.

DOI:10.1093/mmy/myx032
PMID:28482010
Abstract

Dysbiosis of the microbiome on the airway mucosa leads to the development of chronic inflammatory and allergic disorders. The aim of this study was to consider the potential diagnostic criteria for allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) and nonallergic fungal rhinosinusitis (FRS), and the role of fungal presence in an environment for the development of AFRS. In this study, 136 patients were divided into two groups: patients with positive specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) and fungal finding (AFRS group), and patients with negative sIgE and positive fungal finding (FRS group). The study design included: anamnesis data, sIgE, eosinophil count and skin-prick test, rhinology and computerized tomography (CT) observation and mycological finding. Our results showed: (i) the prevalence in Serbia is: AFRS 1.3%, FRS 2.8%; (ii) 30.4% patients with sIgE+ had more often severe and recurrent chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) (P = .005) and the presence of polyps (P = .025); (iii) 46.4% patients with sIgE+ had positive fungi on the sinonasal mucosa and were considered as AFRS; (iv) patients with AFRS had more frequent asthma (P = .024) and chronicity of CRS >10 years (P = .000). The persistent fungal presence and prolonged duration of CRS could be a silent threat for the progression of inflammation and development of FRS. Lavage with hypertonic-NaCl should be included in the everyday hygiene routine in an effort to decrease fungal load and antigenic exposure. The presence of allergological parameters and better response to corticosteroid therapy in AFRS patients should be considered as crucial diagnostic criteria for AFRS.

摘要

气道黏膜微生物群失调会导致慢性炎症和过敏性疾病的发生。本研究的目的是探讨变应性真菌性鼻-鼻窦炎(AFRS)和非变应性真菌性鼻-鼻窦炎(FRS)的潜在诊断标准,以及真菌在AFRS发病环境中的作用。本研究将136例患者分为两组:特异性免疫球蛋白E(sIgE)阳性且真菌检测阳性的患者(AFRS组),以及sIgE阴性且真菌检测阳性的患者(FRS组)。研究设计包括:病史数据、sIgE、嗜酸性粒细胞计数和皮肤点刺试验、鼻科学和计算机断层扫描(CT)观察以及真菌学检查。我们的结果显示:(i)在塞尔维亚的患病率为:AFRS 1.3%,FRS 2.8%;(ii)sIgE阳性的患者中有30.4%更常出现严重且复发性慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRS)(P = 0.005)和息肉(P = 0.025);(iii)sIgE阳性的患者中有46.4%鼻窦黏膜真菌检测呈阳性,被视为AFRS;(iv)AFRS患者哮喘更常见(P = 0.024)且CRS病程>10年(P = 0.000)。真菌持续存在和CRS病程延长可能是炎症进展和FRS发生的潜在威胁。应将高渗氯化钠冲洗纳入日常卫生习惯,以降低真菌负荷和抗原暴露。AFRS患者存在变应性参数以及对皮质类固醇治疗反应更好应被视为AFRS的关键诊断标准。

相似文献

1
Study toward resolving the controversy over the definition of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis.旨在解决变应性真菌性鼻-鼻窦炎定义争议的研究。
Med Mycol. 2018 Feb 1;56(2):162-171. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myx032.
2
Frequency of fungal isolation and antifungal susceptibility pattern of the fungal isolates from nasal polyps of chronic rhinosinusitis patients at a tertiary care centre in north India.在印度北部的一家三级护理中心,从慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者的鼻息肉中分离出的真菌的分离频率和抗真菌药敏模式。
Med Mycol. 2013 Feb;51(2):164-9. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2012.694486. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
3
Immunohistochemical dissimilarity between allergic fungal and nonfungal chronic rhinosinusitis.变应性真菌性和非真菌性慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的免疫组化差异。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013 May-Jun;27(3):168-76. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3882.
4
Distinctions between allergic fungal rhinosinusitis and chronic rhinosinusitis.变应性真菌性鼻-鼻窦炎与慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的区别。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2010 Nov-Dec;24(6):405-8. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3533.
5
Antigen-specific IgE in sinus mucosa of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis patients.变应性真菌性鼻-鼻窦炎患者鼻窦黏膜中的抗原特异性IgE
Am J Rhinol. 2008 Sep-Oct;22(5):451-6. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3227.
6
[Incidence and detection of fungi and eosinophilic granulocytes in chronic rhinosinusitis].[慢性鼻-鼻窦炎中真菌与嗜酸性粒细胞的发生率及检测]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2003 May;82(5):330-40. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-39777.
7
Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: an attempt to resolve the diagnostic dilemma.变应性真菌性鼻-鼻窦炎:解决诊断难题的一次尝试。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Feb;132(2):173-8. doi: 10.1001/archotol.132.2.173.
8
Allergic fungal rhinitis and rhinosinusitis.变应性真菌性鼻-鼻窦炎。
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2010 May;7(3):245-52. doi: 10.1513/pats.200909-098AL.
9
Chapter 7: Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis.第七章:变应性真菌性鼻-鼻窦炎。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013 May-Jun;27 Suppl 1:S26-7. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3891.
10
Socioeconomic factors in the diagnosis of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis.变应性真菌性鼻-鼻窦炎诊断中的社会经济因素
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Jan;138(1):38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.10.020.

引用本文的文献

1
Isolated fronto-ethmoidal allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: case report and review of the literature.孤立性额窦-筛窦过敏性真菌性鼻-鼻窦炎:病例报告及文献复习
Acta Biomed. 2019 Dec 23;90(4):563-567. doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i4.7832.
2
Fungal Rhinosinusitis: Unravelling the Disease Spectrum.真菌性鼻-鼻窦炎:剖析疾病谱
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2019 Jun;18(2):164-179. doi: 10.1007/s12663-018-01182-w. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
3
Fungi-Induced Upper and Lower Respiratory Tract Allergic Diseases: One Entity.真菌诱导的上、下呼吸道过敏性疾病:一个整体。
Front Microbiol. 2018 Apr 3;9:583. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00583. eCollection 2018.