Allen Carrie, Zarowitz Barbara J, O'Shea Terrence, Datto Catherine, Olufade Temitope
Consult Pharm. 2017 May 1;32(5):285-298. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2017.285.
Our goal was to determine the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and treatment differences of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in older adults with noncancer pain compared with opioid-treated patients without OIC.
Retrospective database analysis.
United States nursing facilities: Patients, Participants, facility residents.
None.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Minimum data set and prescription claims, pain, impaired cognition, falls, delirium, and drug treatment.
We found an OIC prevalence of 8.9%. Nursing facility residents with OIC are more likely to have severe pain (31.3% vs. 29%; P < 0.001), pain in the last 5 days (71.2% vs. 69.2%; P < 0.001), almost constant pain (18.1% vs.13.3%; P < 0.001), and pain interfering with daily activities (36.1% vs. 30%; P < 0.001). Strong opioids were more likely prescribed and the duration of use was longer than in non-OIC nursing facility residents. Cognitive impairment (56.3% vs. 49.8%; P < 0.001), fall rate (4.8% vs. 2.5%; P = 0.023), delirium indicators (confusion assessment method; P < 0.001), urinary incontinence (59.1% vs. 54.9%; P < 0.001), depression (66.5% vs. 61.6%; P < 0.001), and depression severity score (4.7% vs. 4.3%; P < 0.001) were higher in nursing facility residents with OIC. Nursing facility residents with OIC had a higher percentage of concomitantly prescribed anticholinergic medications (76.7% vs. 70.0%; P < 0.001) and a higher mean anticholinergic burden score (1.4% vs. 1.1%; P < 0.001). Over-the-counter laxatives were used more often than prescription laxatives: polyethylene glycol (43%), docusate (31.1%), and senna/sennosides (23%) vs. lactulose (18.1%) and lubiprostone (2.2%).
Nursing facility residents with OIC experience suboptimal pain relief, additional anticholinergic adverse drug-related effects, and a decreased quality of life.
我们的目标是确定与未患阿片类药物所致便秘(OIC)的阿片类药物治疗患者相比,非癌性疼痛老年患者中OIC的患病率、临床特征及治疗差异。
回顾性数据库分析。
美国护理机构:患者、参与者、机构居民。
无。
最小数据集和处方申请、疼痛、认知障碍、跌倒、谵妄及药物治疗。
我们发现OIC患病率为8.9%。患有OIC的护理机构居民更有可能出现重度疼痛(31.3%对29%;P<0.001)、过去5天内有疼痛(71.2%对69.2%;P<0.001)、几乎持续疼痛(18.1%对13.3%;P<0.001)以及疼痛干扰日常活动(36.1%对30%;P<0.001)。与未患OIC的护理机构居民相比,更有可能开具强效阿片类药物且使用时间更长。患有OIC的护理机构居民的认知障碍(56.3%对49.8%;P<0.001)、跌倒率(4.8%对2.5%;P = 0.023)、谵妄指标(意识模糊评估法;P<0.001)、尿失禁(59.1%对54.9%;P<0.001)、抑郁(66.5%对61.6%;P<0.001)及抑郁严重程度评分(4.7%对4.3%;P<0.001)更高。患有OIC的护理机构居民同时开具抗胆碱能药物的比例更高(76.7%对70.0%;P<0.001)且抗胆碱能负担平均评分更高(1.4%对1.1%;P<0.001)。非处方泻药的使用比处方泻药更频繁:聚乙二醇(43%)、多库酯(31.1%)和番泻叶/番泻苷(23%)对比乳果糖(18.1%)和鲁比前列酮(2.2%)。
患有OIC的护理机构居民疼痛缓解效果欠佳,存在额外的抗胆碱能药物相关不良反应,生活质量下降。