• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采集参数对锥形束计算机断层扫描评估下颌第三磨牙的影响。

Influence of acquisition parameters on the evaluation of mandibular third molars through cone beam computed tomography.

作者信息

Lagos de Melo Larissa Pereira, Oenning Anne Caroline Costa, Nadaes Mariana Rocha, Nejaim Yuri, Neves Frederico Sampaio, Oliveira Matheus Lima, Freitas Deborah Queiroz

机构信息

Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), São Paulo, Brazil.

Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017 Aug;124(2):183-190. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2017.03.008
PMID:28483471
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to assess the influence of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisition parameters on the evaluation of mandibular third molars and their relationship to the mandibular canal.

STUDY DESIGN

Eight dry human mandibles with 13 mandibular third molars were scanned with one CBCT unit. Voxel size (0.2 and 0.3 mm), field of view (FOV) size (12 × 8.5 cm and 5 × 5 cm), and number of basis images (450 and 720) were the variables studied. Two examiners evaluated the images, and the resulting data were compared through McNemar, McNemar-Bowker, and Student t tests. Additionally, dosimetry was determined for all protocols tested, and radiation doses were compared through analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The variables did not influence evaluation of mandibular third molars, except for voxel size, when assessing contact between the tooth and the mandibular canal (P = .021). Although FOV and number of basis images affected radiation dose, voxel size did not.

CONCLUSIONS

FOV size and number of basis images did not influence the evaluation of mandibular third molars and their relationship to the mandibular canal in the CBCT unit used. Conversely, smaller voxel size affected the assessment of contact between the tooth and the mandibular canal. In units in which voxel size does not influence radiation dose, the most appropriate CBCT protocol is the one using a smaller voxel size and delivering the lowest radiation dose to the patient.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)采集参数对下颌第三磨牙评估的影响及其与下颌管的关系。

研究设计

使用一台CBCT设备对8具带有13颗下颌第三磨牙的干燥人类下颌骨进行扫描。研究的变量包括体素大小(0.2和0.3毫米)、视野(FOV)大小(12×8.5厘米和5×5厘米)以及基础图像数量(450和720)。两名检查者对图像进行评估,并通过McNemar检验、McNemar - Bowker检验和Student t检验对所得数据进行比较。此外,还对所有测试方案进行了剂量测定,并通过方差分析比较辐射剂量。

结果

在评估牙齿与下颌管之间的接触时,除体素大小外,其他变量均不影响下颌第三磨牙的评估(P = 0.021)。虽然视野和基础图像数量会影响辐射剂量,但体素大小不会。

结论

在所用的CBCT设备中,视野大小和基础图像数量不影响下颌第三磨牙的评估及其与下颌管的关系。相反,较小的体素大小会影响对牙齿与下颌管之间接触的评估。在体素大小不影响辐射剂量的设备中,最合适的CBCT方案是使用较小体素大小并为患者提供最低辐射剂量的方案。

相似文献

1
Influence of acquisition parameters on the evaluation of mandibular third molars through cone beam computed tomography.采集参数对锥形束计算机断层扫描评估下颌第三磨牙的影响。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017 Aug;124(2):183-190. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
2
The effect of optimum, indication-specific imaging fields on the radiation exposure from CBCT examinations of impacted maxillary canines and mandibular third molars.最佳适应证特异性成像范围对埋伏上颌尖牙和下颌第三磨牙锥形束 CT 检查辐射暴露的影响。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2024 Jan;82(1):66-73. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2023.2258981. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
3
External root resorption of the second molar associated with mesially and horizontally impacted mandibular third molar: evidence from cone beam computed tomography.与近中水平阻生下颌第三磨牙相关的第二磨牙牙根外吸收:来自锥形束计算机断层扫描的证据
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 May;21(4):1335-1342. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1888-y. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
4
Panoramic radiography in evaluating the relationship of mandibular canal and impacted third molars in comparison with cone-beam computed tomography.全景X线摄影术与锥形束计算机断层扫描术在评估下颌管与阻生第三磨牙关系中的比较
Mymensingh Med J. 2014 Oct;23(4):781-6.
5
Minimum size and positioning of imaging field for CBCT-scans of impacted lower third molars: a retrospective study.锥形束 CT 扫描在下颌阻生第三磨牙中的最小成像范围和定位:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Dec 29;21(1):670. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-02029-6.
6
Quantitative assessment of mandibular canal compression assessed by cone beam computed tomography.锥形束计算机断层扫描评估下颌管压迫的定量分析
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017 Oct;124(4):413-419. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
7
Reproducibility of mandibular third molar assessment comparing two cone beam CT units in a matched pairs design.两种锥形束 CT 设备评估下颌第三磨牙的重复性:配对设计研究。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(10):20130228. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130228. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography, stereo-scanography and cone beam CT for assessment of mandibular third molars before surgery.全景放射摄影、立体扫描和锥形束 CT 在手术前评估下颌第三磨牙的诊断准确性。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 Nov;71(6):1391-8. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2013.764574. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
9
Association between impacted third molars and position of the mandibular canal: a morphological analysis using cone-beam computed tomography.阻生第三磨牙与下颌管位置的关系:使用锥形束计算机断层扫描的形态学分析
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Dec;56(10):952-955. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.10.280. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
10
Radiographic evaluation of mandibular third molars: an ex vivo comparative study between multilayer and conventional panoramic radiography.下颌第三磨牙的放射学评估:多层和传统全景放射摄影的体外比较研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Nov;27(11):6451-6460. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05249-y. Epub 2023 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Cone-beam computed tomography in endodontics: from the specific technical considerations of acquisition parameters and interpretation to advanced clinical applications.口腔锥形束计算机断层扫描技术在牙髓病学中的应用:从采集参数和解读的特定技术考量到高级临床应用
Restor Dent Endod. 2023 Dec 11;49(1):e1. doi: 10.5395/rde.2024.49.e1. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Radiographic evaluation of mandibular third molars: an ex vivo comparative study between multilayer and conventional panoramic radiography.下颌第三磨牙的放射学评估:多层和传统全景放射摄影的体外比较研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Nov;27(11):6451-6460. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05249-y. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
3
Influence of Voxel Size on CBCT Images for Dental Implants Planning.
体素大小对用于牙种植体规划的锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像的影响。
Eur J Dent. 2022 May;16(2):381-385. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1736388. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
4
Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?牙颌面影像学检查的放射生物学风险:我们是否应该担忧?
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021 Sep 1;50(6):20210153. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20210153. Epub 2021 May 14.
5
Do the number of basis images and metal artifact reduction affect the production of artifacts near and far from zirconium dental implants in CBCT?在锥形束 CT 中,基础图像数量和金属伪影减少是否会影响距氧化锆牙科植入物远近的伪影产生?
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Sep;25(9):5281-5291. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03836-5. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
6
Novel low-dose protocols using cone beam computed tomography in dental medicine: a review focusing on indications, limitations, and future possibilities.新型低剂量锥形束计算机断层扫描在口腔医学中的应用:一项关注适应证、局限性和未来可能性的综述。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Jun;23(6):2573-2581. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02907-y. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
7
Are different imaging methods affecting the treatment decision of extractions of mandibular third molars? Methodological and statistical issues.不同的影像学方法是否会影响下颌第三磨牙拔除的治疗决策?方法学和统计学问题。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018 Jul;47(5):20180043. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20180043. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
8
DIMITRA paediatric skull phantoms: development of age-specific paediatric models for dentomaxillofacial radiology research.DIMITRA 儿科头颅模型:为牙颌面放射学研究开发特定年龄的儿科模型。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018 Feb;47(3):20170285. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20170285. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
9
Comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam CT in the assessment of juxta-apical radiolucency.全景X线摄影与锥形束CT在评估根尖周透射区中的比较。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018 Jan;47(1):20170198. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20170198. Epub 2017 Nov 1.