Cai Elijah Zhengyang, Sankaran Kalarani, Tan Monica, Chan Yiong Huak, Lim Thiam Chye
Department of Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Department of Nursing, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
World J Surg. 2017 Sep;41(9):2401-2408. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4050-3.
Our novel technique of pen torch transillumination (PTI) uses a cheap and easily available instrument (Penlite-LP212, Energizer, Missouri, USA) to visualize superficial veins invisible to the naked eye. We evaluate the efficacy of PTI in improving venepuncture success rate (SR) for patients with poor venous access.
This prospective randomized controlled trial looked at adult patients (n = 69) aged 21-90 with difficult venous access (history of ≥3 consecutive attempts required for successful cannulation during the current admission) requiring non-emergent venepuncture. Patients underwent venepuncture over the upper-limb using one of the following: conventional venepuncture (control); Veinlite EMS (TransLite, Texas, USA), a commercial transillumination device; PTI. Outcome measures were: successful cannulation within 2 attempts and total duration of venepuncture. Fisher's exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed.
A significantly larger number of patients had successful venepuncture within 2 attempts using PTI (22/23, 95.7%) and Veinlite (23/23, 100%), compared to the controls (7/23, 30.4%) (p < 0.05). The total duration required for successful venepuncture was significantly shorter for Veinlite (mean 3.7 min, 1.0-5.3 min) and PTI (mean 8.5 min, range 1.08-27 min) compared to the controls (mean 23.2 min, range 1.88-46.5 min) (p < 0.05).
PTI allows users to visualize veins invisible to the naked eye. Thrombosed/tortuous veins, branch points and valves, are easily identified and avoided. It has comparable efficacy to Veinlite and is cheaper (Veinlite-USD 227 vs. Penlite-LP212-USD 7.00) and more easily available. PTI improves patient care, especially in developing regions where costs are a concern.
我们的新型笔式手电筒透照技术(PTI)使用一种廉价且易于获取的仪器(美国密苏里州劲量公司生产的Penlite-LP212)来观察肉眼不可见的浅表静脉。我们评估了PTI对静脉通路不佳患者提高静脉穿刺成功率(SR)的效果。
这项前瞻性随机对照试验观察了年龄在21至90岁之间、静脉通路困难(本次住院期间成功置管需要连续≥3次尝试的病史)且需要进行非紧急静脉穿刺的成年患者(n = 69)。患者使用以下方法之一在上肢进行静脉穿刺:传统静脉穿刺(对照组);Veinlite EMS(美国得克萨斯州TransLite公司生产),一种商用透照设备;PTI。观察指标为:2次尝试内成功置管以及静脉穿刺的总时长。进行了Fisher精确检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验。
与对照组(7/23,30.4%)相比,使用PTI(22/23,95.7%)和Veinlite(23/23,100%)的患者在2次尝试内成功进行静脉穿刺的人数显著更多(p < 0.05)。与对照组(平均23.2分钟,范围1.88至46.5分钟)相比,Veinlite(平均3.7分钟,1.0至5.3分钟)和PTI(平均8.5分钟,范围1.08至27分钟)成功进行静脉穿刺所需的总时长显著更短(p < 0.05)。
PTI使使用者能够观察到肉眼不可见的静脉。血栓形成/迂曲的静脉、分支点和瓣膜易于识别并避开。它与Veinlite具有相当的效果,且更便宜(Veinlite为227美元,而Penlite-LP212为7.00美元)且更容易获取。PTI改善了患者护理,尤其是在关注成本的发展中地区。