Kim Tania N
Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 May 9;12(5):e0176499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176499. eCollection 2017.
Neighboring plants can decrease or increase each other's likelihood of damage from herbivores through associational resistance or susceptibility, respectively. Associational effects (AE) can transpire through changes in herbivore or plant traits that affect herbivore movement, densities, and feeding behaviors to ultimately affect plant damage. While much work has focused on understanding the mechanisms that underlie associational effects, we know little about how these mechanisms are influenced by neighborhood composition, i.e., plant density or relative frequency which is necessary to make predictions about when AE should occur in nature. Using a series of field and greenhouse experiments, I examined how plant density and relative frequency affected plant damage to Solanum carolinense and four mechanisms that underlie AE; (i) accumulation of insect herbivores and arthropod predators, (ii) microclimate conditions, (iii) plant resistance, and (iv) specialist herbivore preference. I found a positive relationship between S. carolinense damage and the relative frequency of a non-focal neighbor (Solidago altissima) and all four AE mechanisms were influenced by one or multiple neighborhood components. Frequency-dependence in S. carolinense damage is most likely due to greater generalist herbivore load on S. carolinense (through spillover from S. altissima) with microclimate variables, herbivore preference, predation pressures, and plant resistance having relatively weaker effects. Associational effects may have long-term consequences for these two plant species during plant succession and understanding context-dependent herbivory has insect pest management implication for other plant species in agriculture and forestry.
相邻植物可分别通过联合抗性或联合易感性降低或增加彼此遭受食草动物损害的可能性。联合效应(AE)可通过食草动物或植物性状的变化发生,这些变化会影响食草动物的移动、密度和取食行为,最终影响植物损害。虽然许多研究致力于理解联合效应背后的机制,但我们对这些机制如何受邻域组成的影响知之甚少,邻域组成即植物密度或相对频率,这对于预测自然中何时会发生联合效应是必要的。通过一系列田间和温室实验,我研究了植物密度和相对频率如何影响卡罗来纳茄的植物损害以及联合效应背后的四种机制;(i)昆虫食草动物和节肢动物捕食者的积累,(ii)小气候条件,(iii)植物抗性,以及(iv)专性食草动物偏好。我发现卡罗来纳茄的损害与非焦点邻居(高一枝黄花)的相对频率之间存在正相关关系,并且所有四种联合效应机制都受到一个或多个邻域成分的影响。卡罗来纳茄损害中的频率依赖性最有可能是由于卡罗来纳茄上的广食性食草动物负荷更大(通过高一枝黄花的溢出),而小气候变量、食草动物偏好、捕食压力和植物抗性的影响相对较弱。联合效应可能在植物演替过程中对这两种植物产生长期影响,并且理解上下文依赖的食草作用对农业和林业中的其他植物物种的害虫管理具有启示意义。