Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, 56 College Rd, James Hall Room 114, Durham, NH 03824,USA.
Department of Earth Sciences, University of California Riverside, 900 University Ave., Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Tree Physiol. 2017 Oct 1;37(10):1415-1425. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx048.
In temperate deciduous forests, vertical gradients in leaf mass per area (LMA) and area-based leaf nitrogen (Narea) are strongly controlled by gradients in light availability. While there is evidence that hydrostatic constraints on leaf development may diminish LMA and Narea responses to light, inherent differences among tree species may also influence leaf developmental and morphological response to light. We investigated vertical gradients in LMA, Narea and leaf carbon isotope composition (δ13C) for three temperate deciduous species (Carpinus caroliniana Walter, Fagus grandifolia Ehrh., Liriodendron tulipifera L.) that differed in growth strategy (e.g., indeterminate and determinate growth), shade tolerance and leaf area to sapwood ratio (Al:As). Leaves were sampled across a broad range of light conditions within three vertical layers of tree crowns to maximize variation in light availability at each height and to minimize collinearity between light and height. All species displayed similar responses to light with respect to Narea and δ13C, but not for LMA. Light was more important for gradients in LMA for the shade-tolerant (C. caroliniana) and -intolerant (L. tulipifera) species with indeterminate growth, and height (e.g., hydrostatic gradients) and light were equally important for the shade-tolerant (F. grandifolia) species with determinate growth. Fagus grandifolia had a higher morphological plasticity in response to light, which may offer a competitive advantage in occupying a broader range of light conditions throughout the canopy. Differences in responses to light and height for the taller tree species, L. tulipifera and F. grandifolia, may be attributed to differences in growth strategy or Al:As, which may alter morphological and functional responses to light availability. While height was important in F. grandifolia, height was no more robust in predicting LMA than light in any of the species, confirming the strong role of light availability in determining LMA for temperate deciduous species.
在温带落叶林中,叶面积比(LMA)和基于面积的叶氮(Narea)的垂直梯度受光可用性梯度的强烈控制。虽然有证据表明,对叶片发育的静水压力限制可能会降低 LMA 和 Narea 对光的响应,但树种之间的固有差异也可能影响叶片对光的发育和形态响应。我们调查了三种温带落叶树种(Carpinus caroliniana Walter、Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.、Liriodendron tulipifera L.)的 LMA、Narea 和叶片碳同位素组成(δ13C)的垂直梯度,这些树种在生长策略(如不定型和定型生长)、耐荫性和叶面积与边材比(Al:As)方面存在差异。叶片在树冠的三个垂直层中跨越广泛的光照条件进行采样,以最大限度地增加每个高度的光照可变性,并最小化光照与高度之间的共线性。所有物种在 Narea 和 δ13C 方面对光的响应相似,但 LMA 则不同。对于具有不定型生长的耐荫(C. caroliniana)和不耐荫(L. tulipifera)物种,光照对 LMA 梯度更为重要,而对于具有定型生长的耐荫(F. grandifolia)物种,高度(例如静水梯度)和光照同样重要。Fagus grandifolia 对光的形态可塑性更高,这可能使其在树冠内占据更广泛的光照条件方面具有竞争优势。对于较高的树种 L. tulipifera 和 F. grandifolia,对光和高度的响应差异可能归因于生长策略或 Al:As 的差异,这可能会改变对光可用性的形态和功能响应。虽然高度在 F. grandifolia 中很重要,但在任何物种中,高度在预测 LMA 方面都不如光可靠,这证实了光可用性在确定温带落叶树种 LMA 方面的重要作用。