Fülöp Tibor, Zsom Lajos, Tapolyai Mihály B, Molnar Miklos Z, Rosivall László
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
FMC Extracorporeal Life Support Center, Fresenius Medical Care Hungary, Medical and Health Science Centre, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
J Renal Inj Prev. 2016 Nov 6;6(1):35-42. doi: 10.15171/jrip.2017.07. eCollection 2017.
Attempts to identify specific therapies to reverse acute kidney injury (AKI) have been unsuccessful in the past; only modifying risk profile or addressing the underlying disease processes leading to AKI proved efficacious. The current thinking on recognizing AKI is compromised by a "kidney function percent-centered" viewpoint, a paradigm further reinforced by the emergence of serum creatinine-based automated glomerular filtration reporting over the last two decades. Such thinking is, however, grossly corrupted for AKI and poorly applicable in critically ill patients in general. Conventional indications for renal replacement therapy (RRT) may have limited applicability in critically ill patients and there has been a relative lack of progress on RRT modalities in these patients. AKI in critically ill patients is a highly complex syndrome and it may be counterproductive to produce complex clinical practice guidelines, which are labor and resource-intensive to maintain, difficult to memorize or may not be immediately available in all settings all over the world. Additionally, despite attempts to develop reliable and reproducible biomarkers to replace serum creatinine as a guide to therapy such biomarkers failed to materialize. Under such circumstances, there is an ongoing need to reassess the practical value of simple measures, such as volume-related weight gain (VRWG) and urine output, both for prognostic markers and clinical indicators for the need for RRT. This current paper reviews the practical utility of VRWG as an independent indication for RRT in face of reduced urine output and hemodynamic instability.
过去,试图确定逆转急性肾损伤(AKI)的特定疗法均未成功;只有改变风险状况或处理导致AKI的潜在疾病过程才被证明是有效的。目前对AKI的认识受到“以肾功能百分比为中心”观点的影响,在过去二十年中,基于血清肌酐的自动肾小球滤过率报告的出现进一步强化了这一范式。然而,这种思维对于AKI来说是严重错误的,总体上也不适用于重症患者。肾替代治疗(RRT)的传统指征在重症患者中的适用性可能有限,并且在这些患者的RRT模式方面进展相对较少。重症患者的AKI是一种高度复杂的综合征,制定复杂的临床实践指南可能会适得其反,因为维护这些指南需要耗费大量人力和资源,难以记忆,或者在世界各地的所有环境中可能无法立即获得。此外,尽管有人试图开发可靠且可重复的生物标志物来取代血清肌酐作为治疗指南,但此类生物标志物并未出现。在这种情况下,持续需要重新评估简单指标的实用价值,例如与容量相关的体重增加(VRWG)和尿量,它们既是预后标志物,也是RRT需求的临床指标。本文综述了在尿量减少和血流动力学不稳定的情况下,VRWG作为RRT独立指征的实用价值。