Ellison Kristin, Sharma Parikshit S, Trohman Richard
a Division of Cardiology , Rush University Medical Center , Chicago , IL , USA.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2017 Jun;15(6):429-440. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2017.1329011. Epub 2017 May 29.
There have been many evolutionary milestones in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) therapy over the past few decades. These advancements have created new challenges. Right ventricular pacing was the original (late 1950s) breakthrough, however the risk of pacing induced dyssynchrony has become evident. Biventricular pacing provided a viable way to mitigate dyssynchrony, but only benefits certain patients (primarily left bundle branch block and QRS duration ≥150 ms with depressed left ventricular (LV) function). Areas covered: Recent advances have made His Bundle pacing an option that may provide physiological pacing for a wider patient population. Traditional CIED systems utilize transvenous endocardial leads. Unfortunately, leads have been CIEDs' weakest link. Lead-related vascular occlusion, infection and malfunction have spurred the need for percutaneous lead extraction, and development of subcutaneous ICDs and leadless pacing. These options are important for individuals with limited vascular access and those at risk for blood borne infection. Subcutaneous ICDs have been proposed as optimal for younger patients. This recommendation is controversial. Expert commentary: We review recent advances including His bundle pacing, percutaneous lead extraction, leadless pacing and subcutaneous ICDs as well as their potential use in combination. Additional technological evolution promises to make the future of CIEDs exciting.
在过去几十年里,心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)治疗领域取得了许多具有里程碑意义的进展。这些进步也带来了新的挑战。右心室起搏是最初(20世纪50年代末)的突破,但起搏诱导不同步的风险已变得明显。双心室起搏为减轻不同步提供了一种可行的方法,但仅对某些患者(主要是左束支传导阻滞且QRS波时限≥150毫秒伴左心室(LV)功能减退)有益。涵盖领域:最近的进展使希氏束起搏成为一种可为更广泛患者群体提供生理性起搏的选择。传统的CIED系统使用经静脉心内膜导线。不幸的是,导线一直是CIED最薄弱的环节。与导线相关的血管闭塞、感染和故障促使人们需要进行经皮导线拔除,并推动了皮下植入式心脏除颤器(ICD)和无导线起搏技术的发展。这些选择对于血管通路有限的个体以及有血源性感染风险的个体很重要。皮下ICD已被提议作为年轻患者的最佳选择。这一建议存在争议。专家评论:我们回顾了包括希氏束起搏、经皮导线拔除、无导线起搏和皮下ICD等方面的最新进展,以及它们联合使用的潜在可能性。更多的技术进步有望使CIED的未来令人期待。