Billen Johan, Al-Khalifa Mohammed S, Silva Rogério R
KU Leuven, Zoological Institute, Naamsestraat 59, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Zoology, College of Science, P.O. Box 2455, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2017 May;24(4):830-836. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
We studied the external and internal pretarsus structure of the ants and in relation to their very different climbing ability. is a ground-dwelling species that is not able to climb vertical smooth walls. They have a pair of straight pretarsal claws with an average claw tip angle of 56 degrees, while the ventral tarsal surface lacks fine hairs that touch the substrate. They have no adhesive pad on the vestigial arolium, while the arolium gland is very small. , on the other hand, is an arboreal and thus well-climbing species with a very strong grip on the substrate. Their pretarsal claws are very hooked, with a claw tip angle around 75 degrees. They have dense arrays of fine hairs on the ventral tarsal surface, a well-developed arolium and arolium gland. These clearly different morphological characteristics are in line with the opposite climbing performance of both species.
我们研究了蚂蚁跗节前部的外部和内部结构,以及它们截然不同的攀爬能力。[某一物种]是一种地栖物种,无法攀爬垂直光滑的墙壁。它们有一对笔直的跗前爪,爪尖平均角度为56度,而跗节腹面没有接触底物的细毛。它们在退化的中垫上没有粘附垫,而中垫腺非常小。另一方面,[另一物种]是树栖的,因此是攀爬能力很强的物种,对底物有很强的抓地力。它们的跗前爪非常弯曲,爪尖角度约为75度。它们在跗节腹面有密集的细毛阵列、发育良好的中垫和中垫腺。这些明显不同的形态特征与两个物种相反的攀爬表现一致。