Moore Shannon P, Newberry Desi M, Jnah Amy J
Neonatal Netw. 2017 May 1;36(3):152-159. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.36.3.152.
Placental blood remains an underused resource for early neonatal care despite ample evidence that placental blood provides the same clinical decision making information without the need for painful, invasive blood sampling procedures. Potential benefits of placental/umbilical blood sampling (PUBS) for neonatal admission labs include decreases in pain reactivity, rates of anemia, need for blood transfusions, use of vasopressors, and rates of intraventricular hemorrhage. Here, we present a unique case study of a critically ill infant with contradictory blood culture results from PUBS and direct infant sampling. A negative admission direct sample blood culture result compared with a positive admission PUBS blood culture result suggests that infection may have been missed in the direct infant sample. Relevant placental embryology and circulation is also described, as well as the benefits of PUBS for neonatal admission labs (with focus on the blood culture), challenges associated with PUBS practice, and strategies for implementation of PUBS.
尽管有充分证据表明胎盘血能提供相同的临床决策信息,且无需进行痛苦的侵入性采血程序,但胎盘血在早期新生儿护理中仍是一种未得到充分利用的资源。胎盘/脐血采样(PUBS)用于新生儿入院实验室检测的潜在益处包括降低疼痛反应性、贫血发生率、输血需求、血管加压药的使用以及脑室内出血发生率。在此,我们呈现一个独特的病例研究,该重症婴儿的PUBS血培养结果与直接采集婴儿血的培养结果相互矛盾。入院时直接采集婴儿血的血培养结果为阴性,而PUBS血培养结果为阳性,这表明直接采集婴儿血的样本可能漏诊了感染。本文还描述了相关的胎盘胚胎学和循环情况,以及PUBS用于新生儿入院实验室检测的益处(重点是血培养)、PUBS操作相关的挑战以及PUBS的实施策略。