Ran Jun, Morelli John N, Xie Ruyi, Zhang Xiaoli, Liang Xiaoqing, Liu Xuanlin, Li Xiaoming
Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Sep;61(3):271-282. doi: 10.23736/S1824-4785.17.02981-8. Epub 2017 May 12.
Despite major progress in the imaging diagnosis of spondyloarthritis (SpA), the relative advantages of various available imaging techniques remain unclear. The aim of this study is to assess the current use of imaging in the diagnosis of SpA and to provide suitable recommendations for the use of imaging as an outcome measure as defined in the Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria.
A systematic literature search regarding imaging in SpA was performed. Articles were assessed by two reviewers to identify and summarized key information pertaining to imaging in SpA.
The search identified 180 relevant articles. Conventional radiography (CR) (17 articles), ultrasound (US) (26 articles), conventional computed tomography (CT) (13 articles), spectral computed tomography (spectral CT) (2 articles), bone scintigraphy (24 articles), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were assessed (98 articles). Sacroiliitis and enthesitis were the major imaging findings in SpA. Multiple studies assessed the feasibility, validity, or differences among imaging modalities for the diagnosis of SpA; however, comprehensive assessments were not available due to a paucity of prospective imaging studies. CR is a widely available, inexpensive initial approach to evaluate patients with suspected SpA. CT enables assessment of structural changes from chronic sacroiliitis including bony erosions, subchondral sclerosis, joint space narrowing, and ankyloses; however, both CR and CT modalities are insensitive for demonstrating early enthesitis and sacroiliitis in SpA. US mainly identifies appendicular enthesitis but is more limited with respect to the sacroiliac joints. Bone scintigraphy can identify sacroiliac joint lesions and semi-quantitatively assess active sacroiliitis. MRI optimally evaluates not only early enthesitis and sacroiliitis of SpA but also chronic structural changes to the sacroiliac joints.
More than one modality may be required for diagnostic and assessment of SpA depending upon disease characteristics and evolution. CR is a suitable initial examination while MRI is able to detect both early and late changes of SpA. A combination of CR and MRI is recommended for the diagnosis and assessment of SpA.
尽管脊柱关节炎(SpA)的影像学诊断取得了重大进展,但各种现有影像学技术的相对优势仍不明确。本研究的目的是评估目前影像学在SpA诊断中的应用,并根据国际脊柱关节炎评估协会(ASAS)标准中定义的影像学作为结局指标的使用提供合适的建议。
对有关SpA影像学的文献进行了系统检索。由两位审稿人对文章进行评估,以识别和总结与SpA影像学相关的关键信息。
检索到180篇相关文章。对传统X线摄影(CR)(17篇文章)、超声(US)(26篇文章)、传统计算机断层扫描(CT)(13篇文章)、光谱计算机断层扫描(光谱CT)(2篇文章)、骨闪烁显像(24篇文章)和磁共振成像(MRI)(98篇文章)进行了评估。骶髂关节炎和附着点炎是SpA的主要影像学表现。多项研究评估了SpA诊断中不同影像学检查方法的可行性、有效性或差异;然而,由于前瞻性影像学研究较少,尚无全面评估。CR是一种广泛可用、成本低廉的初步方法,用于评估疑似SpA患者。CT能够评估慢性骶髂关节炎的结构变化,包括骨侵蚀、软骨下硬化、关节间隙变窄和强直;然而,CR和CT两种检查方法在显示SpA早期附着点炎和骶髂关节炎方面均不敏感。US主要识别四肢附着点炎,但对骶髂关节的评估更有限。骨闪烁显像可以识别骶髂关节病变并半定量评估活动性骶髂关节炎。MRI不仅能最佳地评估SpA的早期附着点炎和骶髂关节炎,还能评估骶髂关节的慢性结构变化。
根据疾病特征和病程,SpA的诊断和评估可能需要不止一种检查方法。CR是合适的初始检查,而MRI能够检测SpA的早期和晚期变化。推荐联合使用CR和MRI进行SpA的诊断和评估。