World Health Information Science Consultants, 275 Grove St., Suite 2-400, Newton, MA, 02466, USA.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Apr;32(4):261-267. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0256-9.
Information that is not made explicit is nonetheless embedded in most of our standard procedures. In its simplest form, embedded information may take the form of prior knowledge held by the researcher and presumed to be agreed to by consumers of the research product. More interesting are the settings in which the prior information is held unconsciously by both researcher and reader, or when the very form of an "effective procedure" incorporates its creator's (unspoken) understanding of a problem. While it may not be productive to exhaustively detail the embedded or tacit knowledge that manifests itself in creative scientific work, at least at the beginning, we may want to routinize methods for extracting and documenting the ways of thinking that make "experts" expert. We should not back away from both expecting and respecting the tacit knowledge the pervades our work and the work of others.
虽然大部分标准程序都隐含了未明确表达的信息,但这些信息仍然存在。最简单的形式是,隐含信息可能采用研究人员持有的先验知识的形式,并假定研究产品的消费者也同意这些知识。更有趣的是,在这种情况下,研究人员和读者无意识地持有先验信息,或者当“有效程序”的形式包含其创建者(未说出的)对问题的理解时。虽然详尽地详细描述创造性科学工作中表现出来的隐含或隐性知识可能没有成效,但至少在开始时,我们可能希望将提取和记录使“专家”成为专家的思维方式的方法规范化。我们不应该回避我们工作和他人工作中普遍存在的隐性知识,既不回避,也不轻视。