Visscher Kari L, Faden Lisa, Nassrallah Georges, Speer Stacey, Wiseman Daniele
Department of Medical Imaging, London Health Sciences Centre, Victoria Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.
Centre for Education Research & Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2017 Aug;68(3):249-256. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2016.10.004. Epub 2017 May 11.
This article is a continuation of a qualitative study designed to explore how radiology exposures can impact medical student opinions and perceptions of radiology and radiologists. We focused on: 1) conducting a radiology exposure inventory from the perspective of the medical student; 2) student evaluation of the quality of the radiology exposures and suggestions for positive change; and 3) development of a framework to address the needs of medical students as it relates to radiology education in the undergraduate medical curriculum.
Research methodology and design for this qualitative study were described in detail in a previous article by Visscher et al [1].
Participants included 28 medical students; 18 were in medical school years 1 and 2 (preclerkship), and 10 were in years 3 and 4 (clerkship). Specific to the focus of this article, the data revealed 3 major findings: 1) multiple exposures to radiology exist, and they are received and valued differently depending on the medical student's stage of professional development; 2) medical students value radiology education and want their radiology exposure to be comprehensive and high quality; 3) Medical students have constructive suggestions for improving the quality of both formal and informal radiology exposures.
Performing a radiology exposure inventory from a medical student perspective is a useful way to explore how students receive and value radiology instruction. Medical students want a more comprehensive radiology education that can be summarized using the 5 C's of Radiology Education framework. The 5 C's (curriculum, coaching, collaborating, career and commitment) reflect medical students' desires to learn content that will support them in clinical practice, be supported in their professional development, and have the necessary information to make informed career decisions.
本文是一项定性研究的延续,该研究旨在探讨放射学接触如何影响医学生对放射学及放射科医生的看法和认知。我们关注以下几点:1)从医学生的角度进行放射学接触清单的编制;2)学生对放射学接触质量的评估以及积极改进的建议;3)构建一个框架,以满足医学生在本科医学课程中与放射学教育相关的需求。
Visscher等人[1]在之前的一篇文章中详细描述了这项定性研究的研究方法和设计。
参与者包括28名医学生;其中18名处于医学院1年级和2年级(临床实习前),10名处于3年级和4年级(临床实习阶段)。就本文的重点而言,数据揭示了3个主要发现:1)存在多种放射学接触方式,并且根据医学生的专业发展阶段,他们对这些接触方式的接受程度和重视程度有所不同;2)医学生重视放射学教育,希望他们的放射学接触全面且高质量;3)医学生对提高正式和非正式放射学接触的质量提出了建设性建议。
从医学生的角度编制放射学接触清单是探索学生如何接受和重视放射学教学的一种有用方法。医学生希望获得更全面的放射学教育,这可以用放射学教育框架的5个C来概括。这5个C(课程、指导、协作、职业和承诺)反映了医学生希望学习能够在临床实践中支持他们、在专业发展中得到支持并拥有做出明智职业决策所需信息的内容的愿望。