Suppr超能文献

钐-乙二胺四甲撑膦酸和镥-乙二胺四甲撑膦酸对骨转移患者骨痛缓解的比较治疗效果:患者疼痛评分分析与个体化剂量测定

Comparative Therapeutic Efficacy of Sm-EDTMP and Lu-EDTMP for Bone Pain Palliation in Patients with Skeletal Metastases: Patients' Pain Score Analysis and Personalized Dosimetry.

作者信息

Sharma Sarika, Singh Baljinder, Koul Ashwani, Mittal Bhagwant Rai

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Department of Biophysics, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 May 1;4:46. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00046. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of Sm-EDTMP and Lu-EDTMP in pain palliation in cancer patients with skeletal metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients (25 M:5 F, mean age: 66.0 ± 14.7 years) of breast/prostate cancer with documented skeletal metastases were recruited prospectively. Twenty patients were considered randomly for treatment with Sm-EDTMP and with Lu-EDTMP in 10 patients, respectively. Using fixed dose of 37.0 MBq/kg body weight of each, the mean administered doses of Sm-EDTMP and Lu-EDTMP were 2,155.2 ± 419.6 MBq (1,347-2,857) and 1,935.1 ± 559.4 MBq (1,073-2,627), respectively. Anterior and posterior whole body images were acquired at different time points following radioactivity administration. The first data set of pre-void images (acquired at 0.5 h) representing the total activity of either of Sm-EDTMP or Lu-EDTMP was considered as reference images. All the serial images were used for patients' dosimetry analysis by using organ level internal dosimetry assessment algorithm. Reduction in pain scoring was assessed clinically over 8 weeks by using appropriate WHO criteria and correlated with the absorbed dose to the metastatic sites.

RESULTS

A total of 86 metastatic lesions clearly visualized on post-therapy serial images (matching on bone scans) were evaluated for absorbed dose calculations. Both Sm-EDTMP and Lu-EDTMP delivered similar absorbed dose to the metastatic sites, i.e., 6.22 ± 4.21 and 6.92 ± 3.92 mSv/MBq, respectively. The mean absorbed doses to various other organs were found to be comparable and within the safe limits. A complete response (CR) for each radionuclide was evaluated as 80.0%. No significant alternation in blood parameters and no untoward reaction were observed. However, a mild to severe toxicity was observed in two patients (1 each with Sm-EDTMP and Lu-EDTMP). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that 27/30 patients had pain-free survival (CR) up to the observational period of 8 weeks. However, no statistically significant correlation could be established between the pain scoring and absorbed dose to metastatic sites.

CONCLUSION

Both the radionuclides thus offer an effective and comparable therapeutic efficacy for bone pain palliation at an affordable cost and can be used interchangeably as per the availability.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是比较钐-乙二胺四甲基膦酸(Sm-EDTMP)和镥-乙二胺四甲基膦酸(Lu-EDTMP)在缓解骨转移癌患者疼痛方面的治疗效果。

材料与方法

前瞻性招募了30例有记录的骨转移乳腺癌/前列腺癌患者(25例男性,5例女性,平均年龄:66.0±14.7岁)。随机将20例患者分别用Sm-EDTMP治疗,10例患者用Lu-EDTMP治疗。每种药物均采用固定剂量37.0MBq/kg体重,Sm-EDTMP和Lu-EDTMP的平均给药剂量分别为2,155.2±419.6MBq(1,347 - 2,857)和1,935.1±559.4MBq(1,073 - 2,627)。在给药后的不同时间点采集前后位全身图像。将代表Sm-EDTMP或Lu-EDTMP总活度的首次排尿前图像数据集(在0.5小时采集)视为参考图像。所有系列图像均使用器官水平内照射剂量评估算法进行患者剂量学分析。通过使用适当的世界卫生组织标准在8周内临床评估疼痛评分的降低情况,并与转移部位的吸收剂量相关联。

结果

对治疗后系列图像(与骨扫描匹配)上清晰可见的总共86个转移病灶进行吸收剂量计算评估。Sm-EDTMP和Lu-EDTMP对转移部位的吸收剂量相似,分别为6.22±4.21和6.92±3.92mSv/MBq。发现其他各个器官的平均吸收剂量相当且在安全范围内。每种放射性核素的完全缓解(CR)率评估为80.0%。未观察到血液参数有明显变化,也未出现不良反应。然而,有2例患者(分别为1例使用Sm-EDTMP和1例使用Lu-EDTMP)出现了轻度至重度毒性反应。Kaplan-Meier生存分析表明,27/30例患者在长达8周的观察期内无疼痛生存(CR)。然而,疼痛评分与转移部位的吸收剂量之间未建立统计学上的显著相关性。

结论

因此,这两种放射性核素在以可承受的成本缓解骨痛方面均提供了有效且相当的治疗效果,并且可根据可用性互换使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c1c/5410571/0cff81fd5ea3/fmed-04-00046-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验