• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

众包识别可能的过敏相关因素:利用众包服务进行自动假设生成与验证

Crowdsourced Identification of Possible Allergy-Associated Factors: Automated Hypothesis Generation and Validation Using Crowdsourcing Services.

作者信息

Aramaki Eiji, Shikata Shuko, Ayaya Satsuki, Kumagaya Shin-Ichiro

机构信息

Social Computing Lab, Graduate School of Information Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Japan.

Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 May 16;6(5):e83. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5851.

DOI:10.2196/resprot.5851
PMID:28512079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5449648/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypothesis generation is an essential task for clinical research, and it can require years of research experience to formulate a meaningful hypothesis. Recent studies have endeavored to apply crowdsourcing to generate novel hypotheses for research. In this study, we apply crowdsourcing to explore previously unknown allergy-associated factors.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to collect and test hypotheses of unknown allergy-associated factors using a crowdsourcing service.

METHODS

Using a series of questionnaires, we asked crowdsourcing participants to provide hypotheses on associated factors for seven different allergies, and validated the candidate hypotheses with odds ratios calculated for each associated factor. We repeated this abductive validation process to identify a set of reliable hypotheses.

RESULTS

We obtained two primary findings: (1) crowdsourcing showed that 8 of the 13 known hypothesized allergy risks were statically significant; and (2) among the total of 157 hypotheses generated by the crowdsourcing service, 75 hypotheses were statistically significant allergy-associated factors, comprising the 8 known risks and 53 previously unknown allergy-associated factors. These findings suggest that there are still many topics to be examined in future allergy studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Crowdsourcing generated new hypotheses on allergy-associated factors. In the near future, clinical trials should be conducted to validate the hypotheses generated in this study.

摘要

背景

假设生成是临床研究的一项重要任务,可能需要数年的研究经验才能提出有意义的假设。最近的研究致力于应用众包来生成新的研究假设。在本研究中,我们应用众包来探索此前未知的过敏相关因素。

目的

在本研究中,我们旨在使用众包服务收集并检验关于未知过敏相关因素的假设。

方法

通过一系列问卷,我们要求众包参与者提供关于七种不同过敏的相关因素的假设,并使用为每个相关因素计算的比值比来验证候选假设。我们重复这个溯因验证过程以确定一组可靠的假设。

结果

我们获得了两个主要发现:(1)众包显示,13个已知的假设过敏风险中有8个具有统计学意义;(2)在众包服务生成的总共157个假设中,75个假设是具有统计学意义的过敏相关因素,包括8个已知风险和53个此前未知的过敏相关因素。这些发现表明,未来的过敏研究仍有许多主题有待研究。

结论

众包生成了关于过敏相关因素的新假设。在不久的将来,应该进行临床试验以验证本研究中生成的假设。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e0/5449648/31fdd60c57c6/resprot_v6i5e83_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e0/5449648/caa5393fe4d6/resprot_v6i5e83_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e0/5449648/31fdd60c57c6/resprot_v6i5e83_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e0/5449648/caa5393fe4d6/resprot_v6i5e83_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e0/5449648/31fdd60c57c6/resprot_v6i5e83_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Crowdsourced Identification of Possible Allergy-Associated Factors: Automated Hypothesis Generation and Validation Using Crowdsourcing Services.众包识别可能的过敏相关因素:利用众包服务进行自动假设生成与验证
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 May 16;6(5):e83. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5851.
2
Allergy Risk Finder: Hypothesis Generation System for Allergy Risks via Web Service.过敏风险查找器:通过网络服务生成过敏风险假设的系统。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:1113.
3
Web 2.0-based crowdsourcing for high-quality gold standard development in clinical natural language processing.基于Web 2.0的众包方式用于临床自然语言处理中高质量金标准的开发。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Apr 2;15(4):e73. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2426.
4
Crowdsourcing novel childhood predictors of adult obesity.众包寻找新的儿童肥胖成年预测因子。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 5;9(2):e87756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087756. eCollection 2014.
5
Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research results.众包假设检验:揭示设计选择如何影响研究结果的透明度。
Psychol Bull. 2020 May;146(5):451-479. doi: 10.1037/bul0000220. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
6
Globalizing and crowdsourcing biomedical research.全球化与众包生物医学研究
Br Med Bull. 2016 Dec;120(1):27-33. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldw044. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
7
Crowdsourcing a normative natural language dataset: a comparison of Amazon Mechanical Turk and in-lab data collection.众包一个规范性自然语言数据集:亚马逊土耳其机器人与实验室数据收集的比较
J Med Internet Res. 2013 May 20;15(5):e100. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2620.
8
Crowdsourcing image annotation for nucleus detection and segmentation in computational pathology: evaluating experts, automated methods, and the crowd.用于计算病理学中细胞核检测与分割的众包图像标注:评估专家、自动化方法及大众标注。
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2015:294-305. doi: 10.1142/9789814644730_0029.
9
A Virtual Reading Center Model Using Crowdsourcing to Grade Photographs for Trachoma: Validation Study.基于众包的沙眼照片分级虚拟阅读中心模型:验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 6;25:e41233. doi: 10.2196/41233.
10
Power of crowdsourcing: novel methods of data collection in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.众包的力量:银屑病和银屑病关节炎数据采集的新方法。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Dec;67(6):1273-1281.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.05.013. Epub 2012 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping of Crowdsourcing in Health: Systematic Review.健康领域众包的映射:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 15;20(5):e187. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9330.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between typhoon and asthma symptoms in Japan.日本台风与哮喘症状之间的关联。
Respir Investig. 2016 May;54(3):216-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Nov 29.
2
Crowdsourcing for reference correspondence generation in endoscopic images.用于内镜图像中参考对应生成的众包
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2014;17(Pt 2):349-56. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10470-6_44.
3
Crowd-sourced assessment of technical skills: an adjunct to urology resident surgical simulation training.技术技能的众包评估:泌尿外科住院医师手术模拟训练的辅助手段
J Endourol. 2015 May;29(5):604-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0616. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
4
Innovating openly: researchers and patients turn to crowdsourcing to collaborate on clinical trials, drug discovery, and more.开放式创新:研究人员和患者借助众包模式在临床试验、药物研发等领域展开合作。
IEEE Pulse. 2014 Jan-Feb;5(1):63-7. doi: 10.1109/MPUL.2013.2289467.
5
Japanese Guideline for Food Allergy 2014.《2014年日本食物过敏指南》
Allergol Int. 2014 Sep;63(3):399-419. doi: 10.2332/allergolint.14-RAI-0770.
6
Food allergy: a practice parameter update-2014.食物过敏:实践参数更新-2014.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Nov;134(5):1016-25.e43. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.05.013. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
7
Creation of reliable relevance judgments in information retrieval systems evaluation experimentation through crowdsourcing: a review.通过众包在信息检索系统评估实验中创建可靠的相关性判断:综述
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:135641. doi: 10.1155/2014/135641. Epub 2014 May 19.
8
Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Technical Skills: a novel method to evaluate surgical performance.众包评估技术技能:一种评估手术表现的新方法。
J Surg Res. 2014 Mar;187(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.09.024. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
9
Crowdsourcing novel childhood predictors of adult obesity.众包寻找新的儿童肥胖成年预测因子。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 5;9(2):e87756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087756. eCollection 2014.
10
Crowdsourcing applications for public health.众包在公共卫生中的应用。
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Feb;46(2):179-87. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.016.