Liu F, Ahunbay E, Lawton C, Li X
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part19):3839. doi: 10.1118/1.4735668.
To demonstrate the dosimetric benefits of using an online adaptive replanning scheme to address interfractional variations in radiotherapy of prostate bed.
We have previously developed an online adaptive replanning tool (RealART, Prowess Inc.) aiming to address interfractional variations including organ deformation and rotation. Using this tool, we analyzed a total of 102 daily pre-treatment CTs acquired using an in-room CT (CTVision, Siemens) for 10 patients treated with post-operative IMRT of prostate bed. The PTV was assumed to be the volume enclosed by the 95% prescription isodose surface generated for the conventional four field box. On each daily CT set, contours of the PTV, rectum and bladder were generated by populating the planning contours using an auto-segmentation tool based on deformable registration (ABAS, Elekta) with manual editing. Four plans were generated and compared: (1) IGRT (repositioning) plan by copying the original plan with aligning the anterior rectal wall from the daily CT to that of the planning CT, (2) IGRT plan by copying the original plan with aligning the surgical clips, (3) online adaptive plan by tailoring the original plan to conform to the anatomy of the day, and (4) a new plan re- optimized based on the daily anatomy.
The adaptive and re- optimization plans are in general superior than the two repositioning plans in terms of both target coverage and critical structure sparing. For example, the averages of dose volume quantities for all daily CTs are: rectum V45Gy 55.7±18.0% (one standard deviation), 57.3±17.5%, 48.2±11.8%, 42.5±9.6%; rectum V60Gy 31.8±20.3%, 34.0±16.6%, 22.6±9.7%, 16.5±7.4%; bladder V45Gy 30.0±11.9%, 39.5±24.2%, 37.6±16.8%, 36.5±16.2%; bladder V60Gy 17.4±9.2%, 25.4±18.1%, 24.7±12.7%, 23.9±12.0%; PTV V100 81.9±16.6%, 88.7±7.9%, 92.9±4.6%, and 94.6±2.4% for the above (1)-(4) plans, respectively.
The online adaptive replanning scheme is effective to account for interfractional variations in post-operative radiotherapy of prostate bed. This work is supported partially by MCW Cancer Center Fotsch Foundation.
证明使用在线自适应重新计划方案处理前列腺床放射治疗中分次间变化的剂量学益处。
我们之前开发了一种在线自适应重新计划工具(RealART,Prowess公司),旨在处理包括器官变形和旋转在内的分次间变化。使用该工具,我们分析了10例接受前列腺床术后调强放疗患者使用室内CT(CTVision,西门子)获取的总共102次每日治疗前CT图像。计划靶体积(PTV)假定为由传统四野盒生成的95%处方等剂量面包围的体积。在每组每日CT图像上,通过使用基于可变形配准的自动分割工具(ABAS,医科达)并进行手动编辑来填充计划轮廓,从而生成PTV、直肠和膀胱的轮廓。生成并比较了四个计划:(1)通过将原始计划复制并将每日CT图像上的直肠前壁与计划CT图像上的直肠前壁对齐而生成的影像引导放射治疗(IGRT)(重新定位)计划,(2)通过将原始计划复制并将手术夹对齐而生成的IGRT计划,(3)通过调整原始计划以符合当日解剖结构而生成的在线自适应计划,以及(4)基于每日解剖结构重新优化的新计划。
在靶区覆盖和关键结构保护方面,自适应计划和重新优化计划总体上优于两个重新定位计划。例如,所有每日CT图像的剂量体积量平均值分别为:上述(1) - (4)计划的直肠V45Gy分别为55.7±18.0%(一个标准差)、57.3±17.5%、48.2±11.8%、42.5±9.6%;直肠V60Gy分别为31.8±20.3%、34.0±16.6%、22.6±9.7%、16.5±7.4%;膀胱V45Gy分别为30.0±11.9%、39.5±24.2%、37.6±16.8%、36.5±16.2%;膀胱V60Gy分别为17.4±9.2%、25.4±18.1%、24.7±12.7%、23.9±12.0%;PTV V100分别为81.9±16.6%、88.7±7.9%、92.9±4.6%和94.6±2.4%。
在线自适应重新计划方案可有效处理前列腺床术后放射治疗中的分次间变化。本研究部分得到了密尔沃基医学院癌症中心Fotsch基金会的支持。