Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati (UC) College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Cerebrovascular Cen-ter, UC Neuroscience Institute, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2017 Jun 1;13(3):338-344. doi: 10.1093/ons/opw029.
Most high-riding distal basilar trunk aneurysms can be surgically approached via the transsylvian route and its orbitozygomatic variant. However, on rare occasions, the basilar bifurcation may be unusually high and an approach above the carotid terminus may be required.
In this cadaveric study, we sought to determine the feasibility and exposure limits of the interlenticulostriate approach (ILSA).
A standard transsylvian approach was performed in 10 cerebral hemispheres of 5 formalin-fixed, silicone-injected cadaver heads. The interpeduncular cistern was exposed via the opticocarotid window, carotid-oculomotor window, and supracarotid ILSA window. The latter was measured and an aneurysm clip or ventriculostomy stylet was placed as high as possible through each corridor. Using noncontrast 3-D rotational angiography, clip/stylet positions were measured relative to the dorsum sellae.
ILSA provided a 9.4 × 4.6 mm mean surgical corridor, just enough room for a standard clip applier. This space was limited by the carotid bifurcation inferiorly, the lenticulostriate arteries medially and laterally, and the optic tract superiorly. There was no difference between opticocarotid and carotid-oculomotor windows, in terms of clip position (+8.9 vs +8.6 mm, respectively; P = .78). In contrast, ILSA provided significantly improved superior exposure, compared with either approaches (mean stylet position: +14.3 mm; P = .005). The exposure benefit afforded by ILSA was consistent across all 10 hemispheres, ranging from +2.5 to +8 mm.
For high-riding distal basilar trunk aneurysms that cannot be reached via the frontotemporal orbitozygomatic approach, ILSA can provide a viable route of access. Vascular neurosurgeons should be familiarized with this approach.
大多数高位基底动脉远端干动脉瘤可通过经外侧裂入路及其眶颧变异入路进行手术治疗。然而,在极少数情况下,基底动脉分叉可能异常高,需要在颈动脉末端上方进行入路。
在这项尸体研究中,我们旨在确定纹状体中间入路(ILSA)的可行性和显露范围。
在 5 具福尔马林固定、硅胶灌注的尸头的 10 个大脑半球中进行了标准的经外侧裂入路。通过视颈动脉窗、颈动脉动眼神经窗和超颈动脉 ILSA 窗暴露视交叉池。测量后者,并通过每个通道尽可能高地放置动脉瘤夹或脑室造瘘管。使用非对比 3D 旋转血管造影术,测量夹/管的位置相对于鞍背。
ILSA 提供了 9.4×4.6mm 的平均手术通道,刚好足够容纳标准夹放置器。这个空间受到下方颈动脉分叉、内侧和外侧纹状体动脉以及上方视束的限制。在夹的位置方面,视颈动脉窗和颈动脉动眼神经窗之间没有差异(分别为+8.9mm 和+8.6mm;P=.78)。相比之下,与任何一种方法相比,ILSA 提供了显著改善的上方显露(平均 stylet 位置:+14.3mm;P=.005)。ILSA 提供的显露优势在所有 10 个半球中是一致的,范围从+2.5mm 到+8mm。
对于无法通过额颞眶颧入路到达的高位基底动脉远端干动脉瘤,ILSA 可以提供可行的入路。血管神经外科医生应该熟悉这种方法。