• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1998 年至 2012 年国家癌症数据库中临床淋巴结阴性阴茎癌患者的区域淋巴结清扫模式分析。

Patterns of Regional Lymphadenectomy for Clinically Node-negative Patients With Penile Carcinoma: Analysis From the National Cancer Database From 1998 to 2012.

机构信息

Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.

Department of Urology, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Lubbock, TX.

出版信息

Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Dec;15(6):670-677.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.04.019. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.clgc.2017.04.019
PMID:28522287
Abstract

PURPOSE

Evidence supports upfront regional lymphadenectomy (rND) when primary penile tumors exhibit high-risk features and negative inguinal adenopathy (cN0). We sought to analyze trends in the utilization of early rND as well as assess factors associated with its use and survival outcomes using a nationwide cancer registry database.

PATIENT AND METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with clinically nonmetastatic penile carcinoma and available nodal status who underwent rND from 1998 to 2012. Temporal trends in the utilization of early rND for those with cN0 disease were analyzed, and a multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify predictors for receiving rND. Survival analysis based on rND status was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression.

RESULTS

From 1919 patients with available clinicopathologic variables, performance of early rND was documented in 377 (19.6%) patients with an increase in utilization over time (P = .001). The increase was driven by academic and comprehensive cancer programs compared with community programs (P < .001). Positive predictors were treatment facility, clinical tumor stage, and grade (all P < .05). African American patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.86; P = .01) and those aged > 75 years (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.26-0.68; P < .001) were significantly less likely to receive rND. Early rND was associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.87; P = .003).

CONCLUSION

There was increased use of early lymphadenectomy for patients with cN0 penile cancer driven by comprehensive and academic cancer programs. The study demonstrated demographic and socioeconomic differences that can help identify barriers to care for patients with penile cancer in the United States.

摘要

目的

当原发性阴茎肿瘤具有高危特征且腹股沟淋巴结无转移(cN0)时,证据支持进行 upfront regional lymphadenectomy(rND)。我们试图通过国家癌症登记数据库分析早期 rND 的应用趋势,并评估其应用与生存结果相关的因素。

方法

本研究通过国家癌症数据库,对 1998 年至 2012 年间患有临床非转移性阴茎癌且淋巴结状态可查、接受 rND 的患者进行了查询。分析了 cN0 疾病患者早期 rND 应用的时间趋势,并使用多变量逻辑回归模型确定接受 rND 的预测因素。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法和 Cox 比例风险回归进行基于 rND 状态的生存分析。

结果

在 1919 例具有可用临床病理变量的患者中,377 例(19.6%)患者记录了早期 rND 的应用,且应用呈时间趋势增加(P =.001)。这种增加是由学术和综合性癌症项目驱动的,而不是社区项目(P <.001)。阳性预测因素为治疗机构、临床肿瘤分期和分级(均 P <.05)。非裔美国患者(比值比 [OR],0.53;95%置信区间 [CI],0.33-0.86;P =.01)和年龄 > 75 岁的患者(OR,0.42;95% CI,0.26-0.68;P <.001)rND 应用的可能性明显降低。早期 rND 与总生存改善相关(风险比 [HR],0.67;95% CI,0.52-0.87;P =.003)。

结论

综合性和学术性癌症项目推动了 cN0 阴茎癌患者早期淋巴结切除术的应用增加。该研究表明了美国患者在护理方面存在的人口统计学和社会经济差异,有助于确定这些患者的治疗障碍。

相似文献

1
Patterns of Regional Lymphadenectomy for Clinically Node-negative Patients With Penile Carcinoma: Analysis From the National Cancer Database From 1998 to 2012.1998 年至 2012 年国家癌症数据库中临床淋巴结阴性阴茎癌患者的区域淋巴结清扫模式分析。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Dec;15(6):670-677.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.04.019. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
2
Differences in Survival Associated with Performance of Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Invasive Penile Cancer: Results from the National Cancer Database.生存差异与浸润性阴茎癌患者淋巴结清扫术的相关性:来自国家癌症数据库的研究结果。
J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1238-1244. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.121. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
3
Usage and survival implications of surgical staging of inguinal lymph nodes in intermediate- to high-risk, clinical localized penile cancer: A propensity-score matched analysis.中高危临床局限性阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结手术分期的应用及生存影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Urol Oncol. 2018 Apr;36(4):159.e7-159.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
4
National Trends and Predictors of Organ-sparing for Invasive Penile Tumors: Expanding the Therapeutic Window.全国范围内侵袭性阴茎肿瘤保器官治疗的趋势和预测因素:扩大治疗窗口。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Apr;16(2):e383-e389. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
5
Predictors of Nodal Upstaging in Clinical Node Negative Patients With Penile Carcinoma: A National Cancer Database Analysis.阴茎癌临床淋巴结阴性患者淋巴结分期上调的预测因素:一项国家癌症数据库分析
Urology. 2016 Oct;96:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.033. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
6
Long-term followup of penile carcinoma with high risk for lymph node invasion treated with inguinal lymphadenectomy.腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗具有淋巴结侵犯高风险的阴茎癌的长期随访。
J Urol. 2010 Jun;183(6):2227-32. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.025.
7
Extensive inguinal lymphadenectomy improves overall 5-year survival in penile cancer patients: results from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program.广泛的腹股沟淋巴结清扫术可提高阴茎癌患者的 5 年总生存率:来自监测、流行病学和最终结果计划的结果。
Cancer. 2010 Jun 15;116(12):2960-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25091.
8
Contemporary survival trends in penile cancer: Results from the National Cancer Database.阴茎癌的当代生存趋势:来自国家癌症数据库的结果。
Urol Oncol. 2017 Dec;35(12):674.e1-674.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
9
Establishing Criteria for Bilateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in the Management of Penile Cancer: Lessons Learned from an International Multicenter Collaboration.建立阴茎癌管理中双侧盆腔淋巴结清扫的标准:来自国际多中心合作的经验教训。
J Urol. 2015 Sep;194(3):696-701. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.090. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
10
Lessons learnt in the management of primary invasive penile cancer in an Australian tertiary referral centre: clinical outcomes with a minimum 48 months follow-up study.澳大利亚三级转诊中心原发性浸润性阴茎癌管理的经验教训:至少48个月随访研究的临床结果
Korean J Urol. 2015 Feb;56(2):125-30. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.2.125. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Combined Reporting of Surgical Quality and Cancer Control after Surgical Treatment for Penile Tumors with Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection: The Achievement.手术治疗伴腹股沟淋巴结清扫的阴茎肿瘤后的手术质量和癌症控制的联合报告:成就。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Feb 3;30(2):1882-1892. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30020146.
2
Immune-based therapies in penile cancer.阴茎癌的免疫治疗
Nat Rev Urol. 2022 Aug;19(8):457-474. doi: 10.1038/s41585-022-00617-x. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
3
Non-Coding RNA in Penile Cancer.阴茎癌中的非编码RNA
Front Oncol. 2022 May 13;12:812008. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.812008. eCollection 2022.
4
Technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive.阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结的技术管理:开放手术与微创手术对比
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 May;10(5):2264-2271. doi: 10.21037/tau.2020.04.02.
5
Demographic disparities of penile cancer in Appalachian Kentucky.阿巴拉契亚肯塔基州阴茎癌的人口统计学差异。
Can J Urol. 2021 Jun;28(3):10713-10718.
6
Differences in Survival Associated with Performance of Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Invasive Penile Cancer: Results from the National Cancer Database.生存差异与浸润性阴茎癌患者淋巴结清扫术的相关性:来自国家癌症数据库的研究结果。
J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1238-1244. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.121. Epub 2017 Dec 15.