Mizuno Hiroyuki, Hoshide Satoshi, Tomitani Naoko, Kario Kazuomi
a Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine , Jichi Medical University School of Medicine , Tochigi , Japan.
Blood Press. 2017 Oct;26(5):284-293. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2017.1329623. Epub 2017 May 19.
Data are sparse regarding ambulatory blood pressure (BP) reduction of up-titration from a standard dose to a high dose in both nifedipine controlled-release (CR) and amlodipine. This was a prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label trial.
Fifty-one uncontrolled hypertensives medicated by two or more antihypertensive drugs including a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor and a calcium antagonist were randomly assigned to either the nifedipine CR (80 mg)/candesartan (8 mg) group or the amlodipine (10 mg)/candesartan (8 mg) group.
The changes in 24-hr BP were comparable between the groups. The nifedipine group demonstrated a significant decrease in their urinary albumin creatinine ratio, whereas the amlodipine group demonstrated a significant decrease in their NTproBNP level. However, there was no significant difference in any biomarkers between the two groups.
Nifedipine showed an almost equal effect on ambulatory blood pressure as amlodipine. Their potentially differential effects on renal protection and NTproBNP should be tested in larger samples.
关于硝苯地平控释片(CR)和氨氯地平从标准剂量向上滴定至高剂量时动态血压(BP)降低的数据较少。这是一项前瞻性、随机、多中心、开放标签试验。
51例未控制的高血压患者,服用两种或更多种抗高血压药物,包括肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂和钙拮抗剂,被随机分配至硝苯地平CR(80mg)/坎地沙坦(8mg)组或氨氯地平(10mg)/坎地沙坦(8mg)组。
两组间24小时血压变化相当。硝苯地平组尿白蛋白肌酐比值显著降低,而氨氯地平组NTproBNP水平显著降低。然而,两组间任何生物标志物均无显著差异。
硝苯地平对动态血压的影响与氨氯地平几乎相同。它们对肾脏保护和NTproBNP的潜在差异作用应在更大样本中进行测试。