May Arne
Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Neurol Sci. 2017 May;38(Suppl 1):125-130. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-2866-0.
Due to the clinical picture and also based on early imaging data (Weiller et al. Nat Med 1:658-660, 1995), the brainstem and midbrain structures have been intensely discussed as possible driving or generating structures in migraine. The fact that the brainstem activation persisted after treatment makes it unlikely that this activation was only due to increased activity of the endogenous anti-nociceptive system. It was consequently (and somewhat simplifying) coined the "migraine generator". Since then several studies have focussed on this region when investigating episodic, but also chronic migraine. Denuelle et al. were the first to not only demonstrate significant activations in the midbrain and pons but also in the hypothalamus, which, just like the brainstem activation in the first study, persisted after headache relief with sumatriptan. Expanding these studies into f-MRI studies, refined the involvement of rostral parts of the pons in acute migraine attacks. However, they also focused on the preictal stage of NO-triggered and native human migraine attacks and suggested a predominant role of the hypothalamus shortly before the beginning of migraine headaches as well as alterations in hypothalamic functional connectivity. Additionally, changes in resting-state functional connectivity of the dorsal pons and the hypothalamus in interictal migraineurs has recently been found. The pathophysiology and genesis of migraine attacks is probably not just the result of one single "brainstem generator". Spontaneous oscillations of complex networks involving the hypothalamus, brainstem, and dopaminergic networks lead to changes in activity in certain subcortical and brainstem areas, thus changing susceptibility thresholds and not only starting but also terminating headache attacks.
基于临床表现以及早期影像学数据(韦勒等人,《自然医学》1:658 - 660,1995年),脑干和中脑结构一直是偏头痛可能的驱动或产生结构的激烈讨论焦点。治疗后脑干激活持续存在这一事实表明,这种激活不太可能仅仅是由于内源性抗伤害感受系统活性增加所致。因此(某种程度上简化地)将其称为“偏头痛发生器”。从那时起,在研究发作性偏头痛以及慢性偏头痛时,多项研究都聚焦于该区域。德努埃尔等人不仅首次证明中脑和脑桥有显著激活,还发现下丘脑也有激活,而且与第一项研究中的脑干激活一样,舒马曲坦缓解头痛后这种激活仍持续存在。将这些研究扩展到功能磁共振成像(f - MRI)研究,进一步明确了脑桥前部在急性偏头痛发作中的作用。然而,这些研究也聚焦于一氧化氮触发的和自然发生的人类偏头痛发作的发作前期,并提出偏头痛头痛开始前不久下丘脑起主要作用以及下丘脑功能连接性改变。此外,最近还发现发作间期偏头痛患者脑桥背侧和下丘脑静息态功能连接性的变化。偏头痛发作的病理生理学和发病机制可能不只是单一“脑干发生器”的结果。涉及下丘脑、脑干和多巴胺能网络的复杂网络的自发振荡导致某些皮质下和脑干区域活动变化,从而改变易感性阈值,不仅引发头痛发作,还使其终止。