Amorim Amanda C, Cacciari Licia P, Passaro Anice C, Silveira Simone R B, Amorim Cesar F, Loss Jefferson F, Sacco Isabel C N
Physical Therapy, Speech and Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
University Hospital of the University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2017 May 24;12(5):e0177575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177575. eCollection 2017.
Pelvic floor muscle (PFM) force and coordination are related to urinary incontinence severity and to sexual satisfaction. Health professionals frequently combine classic PFM exercises with hip adduction/abduction contraction to treat these disorders, but the real benefits of this practice are still unknown. Based on a theoretical anatomy approach whereby the levator ani muscle is inserted into the obturator internus myofascia and in which force generated by hip movements should increase the contraction quality of PFMs, our aim was to investigate the effects of isometric hip adduction and abduction on PFM force generation. Twenty healthy, nulliparous women were evaluated using two strain-gauge dynamometers (one cylinder-like inside the vaginal cavity, and the other measuring hip adduction/abduction forces around both thighs) while performing three different tasks: (a) isolated PFM contraction; (b) PFM contraction combined with hip adduction (30% and 50% maximum hip force); and (c) PFM contraction combined with hip abduction (30% and 50% maximum hip force). Data were sampled at 100Hz and subtracted from the offset if existent. We calculated a gradient between the isolated PFM contraction and each hip condition (Δ Adduction and Δ Abduction) for all variables: Maximum force (N), instant of maximum-force occurrence (s), mean force in an 8-second window (N), and PFM force loss (N.s). We compared both conditions gradients in 30% and 50% by paired t-tests. All variables did not differ between hip conditions both in 30% and 50% of maximum hip force (p>.05). PFM contraction combined with isometric hip abduction did not increase vaginal force in healthy and nulliparous women compared to PFM contraction combined with isometric hip adduction. Therefore, so far, the use of hip adduction or abduction in PFM training and treatments are not justified for improving PFM strength and endurance.
盆底肌(PFM)力量和协调性与尿失禁严重程度及性满意度相关。医疗专业人员常将经典的盆底肌锻炼与髋关节内收/外展收缩相结合来治疗这些病症,但这种做法的实际益处仍不明确。基于一种理论解剖学方法,即肛提肌插入闭孔内肌筋膜,且髋关节运动产生的力量应能提高盆底肌的收缩质量,我们的目的是研究等长髋关节内收和外展对盆底肌力量产生的影响。20名健康未育女性在执行三项不同任务时,使用两个应变片式测力计进行评估(一个呈圆柱状置于阴道腔内,另一个测量双侧大腿周围的髋关节内收/外展力量):(a)孤立的盆底肌收缩;(b)盆底肌收缩与髋关节内收相结合(最大髋关节力量的30%和50%);(c)盆底肌收缩与髋关节外展相结合(最大髋关节力量的30%和50%)。数据以100Hz采样,如有偏移则减去。我们计算了所有变量在孤立的盆底肌收缩与每种髋关节条件之间的梯度(Δ内收和Δ外展):最大力量(N)、最大力量出现时刻(s)、8秒窗口内的平均力量(N)以及盆底肌力量损失(N.s)。我们通过配对t检验比较了30%和50%两种条件下的梯度。在最大髋关节力量的30%和50%时,两种髋关节条件下的所有变量均无差异(p>0.05)。与盆底肌收缩与等长髋关节内收相结合相比,盆底肌收缩与等长髋关节外展相结合在健康未育女性中并未增加阴道力量。因此,目前在盆底肌训练和治疗中使用髋关节内收或外展来提高盆底肌力量和耐力尚无依据。