Suppr超能文献

稳定型心绞痛患者全身微血管和大血管的评估:一项病例对照研究。

Evaluation of the systemic micro- and macrovasculature in stable angina: A case-control study.

作者信息

Neisius Ulf, Olson Erin, Rossi Sabrina H, Ibrahim Hagar A, Currie Gemma, Dominiczak Anna F, Delles Christian

机构信息

BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 May 25;12(5):e0178412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178412. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

AIMS

The diagnosis of stable angina involves the use of probability estimates based on clinical presentation, age, gender and cardiovascular risk factors. In view of the link between the cardiac and systemic vasculature we tested whether non-invasive measures of systemic micro- and macrovascular structure and function differentiate between individuals with flow-limiting coronary artery disease (CAD) and those with normal coronary arteries (NCA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We recruited 84 patients undergoing elective coronary angiography for investigation of symptoms of stable angina. Patients were selected for either having significant CAD or NCA (n = 43/41; age, 56±7 vs 57±7 years, P = 0.309). Only microvascular endothelial function, measured using the Endo-PAT2000 device to determine reactive hyperaemia index (CAD vs. NCA; 1.9 [1.5; 2.3] vs. 2.1 [1.8; 2.4], P = 0.03) and sonographic carotid plaque score (CAD vs. NCA; 3.0 [1.5; 4.5] vs. 1.2 [0; 2.55], P<0.001) were significantly different between patients with CAD and NCA. No significant differences were detected in reflection magnitude (CAD vs. NCA; 1.7 [1.5; 1.8] % vs 1.7 [1.5; 1.9] %, P = 0.342), pulse wave velocity (CAD vs. NCA; 7.8±1.4 m/sec vs. 8.3±1.5 m/sec, P = 0.186), carotid intima-media thickness (CAD vs. NCA; 0.73±0.10 mm vs. 0.75±0.10 mm, P = 0.518) or carotid distensibility (CAD vs. NCA; 3.8±1.2 10-3/kPa vs. 3.4±0.9 10-3/kPa, P = 0.092). Also, the c-statistic of the pre-test probability based on history and traditional risk factors (c = 0.665; 95% CI, 0.540-0.789) was improved by the addition of the inverse RHI (c = 0.720; 95% CI, 0.605-0.836), carotid plaque score (c = 0.770, 95% CI, 0.659-0.881), and of both markers in combination (c = 0.801; 95% CI, 0.701-0.900).

CONCLUSION

There are distinct differences in the systemic vasculature between patients with CAD and NCA that may have the potential to guide diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. Carotid artery plaque burden and microvascular function appear to be most promising in this context.

摘要

目的

稳定型心绞痛的诊断涉及基于临床表现、年龄、性别和心血管危险因素的概率估计。鉴于心脏与全身血管系统之间的联系,我们测试了全身微血管和大血管结构及功能的非侵入性测量方法能否区分患有血流限制性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的个体和冠状动脉正常(NCA)的个体。

方法与结果

我们招募了84例因稳定型心绞痛症状而接受选择性冠状动脉造影的患者。根据是否患有严重CAD或NCA对患者进行分组(n = 43/41;年龄,56±7岁对57±7岁,P = 0.309)。只有使用Endo-PAT2000设备测量的微血管内皮功能以确定反应性充血指数(CAD对NCA;1.9 [1.5;2.3]对2.1 [1.8;2.4],P = 0.03)以及超声颈动脉斑块评分(CAD对NCA;3.0 [1.5;4.5]对1.2 [0;2.55],P<0.001)在CAD患者和NCA患者之间存在显著差异。在反射幅度(CAD对NCA;1.7 [1.5;1.8]%对1.7 [1.5;1.9]%,P = 0.342)、脉搏波速度(CAD对NCA;7.8±1.4米/秒对8.3±1.5米/秒,P = 0.186)、颈动脉内膜中层厚度(CAD对NCA;0.73±0.10毫米对0.75±0.10毫米,P = 0.518)或颈动脉扩张性(CAD对NCA;3.8±1.2×10⁻³/kPa对3.4±0.9×10⁻³/kPa,P = 0.092)方面未检测到显著差异。此外,基于病史和传统危险因素的预测试概率的c统计量(c = 0.665;95%CI,0.5–0.789)通过添加反向RHI(c = 0.720;95%CI,0.605–0.836)、颈动脉斑块评分(c = 0.770,95%CI,0.659–0.881)以及两种标志物联合使用(c = 0.801;95%CI,0.701–0.900)而得到改善。

结论

CAD患者和NCA患者的全身血管系统存在明显差异,这可能有潜力指导诊断和治疗决策。在这种情况下,颈动脉斑块负荷和微血管功能似乎最有前景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6de/5444845/e1f5d65cd1f9/pone.0178412.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验