Relyea Rick A, Yurewicz Kerry L
Department of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. relyea+@pitt.edu.
Department of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Oecologia. 2002 May;131(4):569-579. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-0910-z. Epub 2002 May 1.
Understanding how species interactions shape the structure of ecological communities based on pairwise comparisons has been a difficult undertaking for ecologists because effects in reassembled communities can be different than simple density-mediated interactions would suggest. Part of this complexity occurs because many species change their behavior and morphology with different predators and competitors and, thus, change their per-capita interaction rates (i.e. trait-mediated interactions). Our objective was to use a simple experimental community of two predators (larval dragonflies, Anax longipes, and larval salamanders, Ambystoma tigrinum), two prey (larval green frogs, Rana clamitans, and larval bullfrogs, R. catesbeiana), and a shared prey resource to determine whether we can predict interactions in a reassembled community by combining our knowledge of density- and trait-mediated interactions,. We combined pairwise laboratory experiments on predation rates and predator-induced behaviors with a mesocosm experiment to examine density- and trait-mediated effects. We used a factorial combination of no predators, caged Anax (to induce anti-predator traits without changing prey density), and lethal Anax crossed with no predators, caged Ambystoma, and lethal Ambystoma. The species interactions in the reassembled community were qualitatively predictable based on the pairwise experiments. Lethal Anax preyed upon Ambystoma and green frogs while lethal Ambystoma only preyed upon green frogs. Anax also reduced the activity of the green frogs; this caused a decrease in salamander predation on green frogs, a decrease in green frog acquisition of resources, and an increase in bullfrog acquisition of resources. Ambystoma had no effect on green frog activity, no effect on resource acquisition by green frogs, and no effect on resource acquisition by bullfrogs. These results suggest that we can better understand how species interact in natural communities if we have a more detailed understanding of trait-mediated mechanisms. However, if predicting the structure of large communities requires identifying how each species alters its traits in the presence of all other species along with altering density, improving our predictive ability may be a prohibitively large undertaking.
基于成对比较来理解物种相互作用如何塑造生态群落结构,对生态学家来说一直是一项艰巨的任务,因为重新组合的群落中的效应可能与简单的密度介导相互作用所暗示的不同。这种复杂性部分源于许多物种会根据不同的捕食者和竞争者改变其行为和形态,从而改变其人均相互作用率(即性状介导的相互作用)。我们的目标是利用一个简单的实验群落,其中包括两种捕食者(幼虫蜻蜓,长痣绿蜓,和幼虫蝾螈,虎纹钝口螈)、两种猎物(幼虫绿蛙,绿蛙,和幼虫牛蛙,牛蛙)以及一种共享猎物资源,以确定我们是否可以通过结合密度介导和性状介导相互作用的知识来预测重新组合的群落中的相互作用。我们将关于捕食率和捕食者诱导行为的成对实验室实验与中宇宙实验相结合,以研究密度介导和性状介导的效应。我们使用了无捕食者、笼养的长痣绿蜓(以诱导反捕食性状而不改变猎物密度)以及致死的长痣绿蜓与无捕食者、笼养的虎纹钝口螈和致死的虎纹钝口螈的析因组合。基于成对实验,重新组合的群落中的物种相互作用在质量上是可预测的。致死的长痣绿蜓捕食虎纹钝口螈和绿蛙,而致死的虎纹钝口螈只捕食绿蛙。长痣绿蜓还降低了绿蛙的活动;这导致蝾螈对绿蛙的捕食减少、绿蛙获取资源减少以及牛蛙获取资源增加。虎纹钝口螈对绿蛙活动、绿蛙获取资源以及牛蛙获取资源均无影响。这些结果表明,如果我们对性状介导机制有更详细的了解,就能更好地理解物种在自然群落中的相互作用。然而,如果预测大型群落的结构需要确定每个物种在所有其他物种存在的情况下如何改变其性状以及改变密度,那么提高我们的预测能力可能是一项极其艰巨的任务。