Suppr超能文献

[腹腔镜肾切除术中超声腹横肌平面阻滞与套管针穿刺部位浸润术后疼痛的前瞻性研究]

[Post-operative pain after ultrasound transversus abdominis plane block versus trocar site infiltration in laparoscopic nephrectomy: a prospective study].

作者信息

Araújo Ana M, Guimarães Joana, Nunes Catarina S, Couto Paula S, Amadeu Eduarda

机构信息

Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Departamento de Anestesiologia, Emergência e Cuidados Intensivos, Porto, Portugal.

Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Departamento de Anestesiologia, Emergência e Cuidados Intensivos, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2017 Sep-Oct;67(5):487-492. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2016.08.008. Epub 2017 May 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is useful in reducing post-operative pain in laparoscopic nephrectomy compared to placebo. The purpose of this work is to compare post-operative pain and recovery after TAP block or trocar site infiltration (TSI) in this surgery.

METHODS

A prospective, single blinded study on patients scheduled for laparoscopic nephrectomy. Patients were assigned to two groups: TSI Group: trocar site infiltration at the end of surgery; TAP Group: unilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block after induction. Sevoflurane and remifentanil, in a target controlled infusion mode, were used for maintenance of general anesthesia. Before the end of surgery paracetamol, tramadol and morphine were administered. Visual analogue scale (VAS 0-100mm) at rest and with cough was applied in three moments: in recovery room (T1 at admission and T2 before discharge) and 24h after surgery (T3). Pain scores with incentive spirometer were also evaluated at T3. In recovery, morphine was administered as a rescue drug whenever VAS>30mm. Time to oral intake, chair sitting, ambulation and length of hospital stay were evaluated 24h after surgery.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Student's t-test and Chi-square test, and linear regression models. A p-value<0.05 was considered significant. Data are presented as mean (SD).

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled in the study. The primary outcome variable, VAS pain scores did not show a statistical significant difference between groups (p>0.05). VAS at rest (TAP vs. TSI groups) was: T1=33±29 vs. 39±32, T2=10±9 vs. 17±18 and T3=7±12 vs. 10±18. VAS with cough (TAP vs. TSI groups) was: T1=51±34 vs. 45±32, T2=24±24 vs. 33±23 and T3=20±23 vs. 23±23. VAS with incentive spirometer (TAP vs. TSI groups) was: T3=21±27 vs. 21±25. Intraoperative remifentanil consumption was similar between TAP (0.16±0.07mcg.kg.min) and TSI (0.18±0.9mcg.kg.min) groups. There were no differences in opioid consumption between TAP (4.4±3.49mg) and TSI (6.87±4.83mg) groups during recovery. Functional recovery parameters were not statistically different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodal analgesia with TAP block did not show a significant clinical benefit compared with trocar site infiltration in laparoscopic nephrectomies.

摘要

背景

与安慰剂相比,腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞有助于减轻腹腔镜肾切除术后的疼痛。本研究旨在比较该手术中TAP阻滞与套管针穿刺部位浸润(TSI)后的术后疼痛及恢复情况。

方法

对计划行腹腔镜肾切除术的患者进行一项前瞻性单盲研究。患者被分为两组:TSI组:手术结束时进行套管针穿刺部位浸润;TAP组:诱导后行单侧超声引导下TAP阻滞。采用七氟醚和瑞芬太尼靶控输注维持全身麻醉。手术结束前给予对乙酰氨基酚、曲马多和吗啡。在三个时间点应用静息和咳嗽时的视觉模拟评分(VAS 0 - 100mm):恢复室(入院时T1和出院前T2)及术后24小时(T3)。T3时还评估了使用激励肺活量计的疼痛评分。恢复过程中,只要VAS>30mm,就给予吗啡作为补救药物。术后24小时评估经口进食时间、坐椅子时间、行走时间及住院时间。

统计分析

采用学生t检验、卡方检验和线性回归模型。p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。数据以均值(标准差)表示。

结果

40例患者纳入研究。主要观察变量VAS疼痛评分在两组间无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。静息时的VAS(TAP组与TSI组)为:T1 = 33±29 vs. 39±32,T2 = 10±9 vs. 17±18,T3 = 7±12 vs. 10±18。咳嗽时的VAS(TAP组与TSI组)为:T1 = 51±34 vs. 45±32,T2 = 24±24 vs. 33±23,T3 = 20±23 vs. 23±23。使用激励肺活量计时的VAS(TAP组与TSI组)为:T3 = 21±27 vs. 21±25。TAP组(0.16±0.07mcg.kg.min)和TSI组(0.18±0.9mcg.kg.min)术中瑞芬太尼用量相似。恢复过程中,TAP组(4.4±3.49mg)和TSI组(6.87±4.83mg)的阿片类药物用量无差异。两组间功能恢复参数无统计学差异。

结论

在腹腔镜肾切除术中,与套管针穿刺部位浸润相比,TAP阻滞的多模式镇痛未显示出显著的临床益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验