Chandra-Hioe Maria V, Bucknall Martin P, Arcot Jayashree
ARC Training Centre for Advanced Technologies in Food Manufacture, School of Chemical Engineering, UNSW Australia, Sydney 2052, Australia.
Bioanalytical Mass Spectrometry Facility, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, UNSW Australia, Sydney 2052, Australia.
Food Chem. 2017 Nov 1;234:365-371. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.04.179. Epub 2017 May 2.
This study compares enzymatic treatments to release folic acid (FA) and endogenous 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) from infant milk formulae with enzyme-free heat extraction. The limits of detection and quantitation of FA were 1.4ng/mL and 3.1ng/mL, respectively; 7.5ng/mL and 16.2ng/mL for 5-MTHF. Absolute mean recoveries were 85% (FA) and 95% (5-MTHF). The RSD of the within-run variability was 6% and the inter-day variability was 8%. Averaged measurements of FA and 5-MTHF in SRM-1849a were within the certified value range. Analysed folate levels in three brands were greater than label values, because of inherently high 5-MTHF occurring in samples. The results indicate that enzyme-free heat treatment prior to UPLC-MS/MS analysis gives better sensitivity and reduces chromatographic interferences for the determination of FA and 5-MTHF in milk formulae than enzymatic treatments. Enzyme-free heat treatment is more compatible with UPLC-MS/MS than folate extraction techniques involving the addition of enzymes to milk.