Lee Kyoo-Hyung, Lee Je-Hwan, Lee Jung-Hee, Kim Dae-Young, Park Han-Seung, Choi Eun-Ji, Ko Sun-Hye, Seol Miee, Lee Young-Shin, Kang Young-A, Jeon Mijin, Baek Seunghyun, Kang You-Lee, Kim Sung-Han, Yun Sung-Cheol, Kim Hawk, Jo Jae-Cheol, Choi Yunsuk, Joo Young-Don, Lim Sung-Nam
Section of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Section of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Sep;23(9):1555-1566. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.05.025. Epub 2017 May 25.
To investigate the role of antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-containing reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from unrelated (UD) or haploidentical family donors (HFD), we conducted a phase 2 trial of 237 patients (age range, 16 to 69 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in remission. Patients undergoing UD-HCT (n = 93) or HFD-HCT (n = 59) received RIC comprising busulfan, fludarabine, and ATG, 9 mg/kg, whereas those undergoing HCT from matched sibling donors (MSD, n = 85) received myeloablative busulfan and cyclophosphamide conditioning or aforementioned RIC with ATG, 4.5 mg/kg. For graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, cyclosporine and methotrexate were administered. The median follow-up period was 44.7 months after HCT for 161 survivors. For UD-HCT versus HFD-HCT, there were no significant differences in leukemia recurrence, nonrelapse mortality, relapse-free survival, grades 2 to 4 acute GVHD, and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD. Furthermore, when the outcomes of UD-HCT and HFD-HCT were combined and compared with those of MSD-HCT, there were no significant differences in leukemia recurrence (3-year cumulative incidence, 30% versus 29%), nonrelapse mortality (3-year cumulative incidence, 7% versus 8%), relapse-free survival (3-year estimate, 63% versus 63%), and grades 2 to 4 acute GVHD (120-day cumulative incidence, 16% versus 13%). Moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD, however, occurred less frequently in UD/HFD-HCT (2-year cumulative incidence, 22% versus 40%; P = .006). The addition of ATG to conditioning regimen was a significant predictor for less chronic GVHD (subdistribution hazard ratio, .59). In AML in remission, UD/HFD-HCT after ATG-containing RIC achieved leukemia control equivalent to that of MSD-HCT. Despite HLA disparity in UD/HFD-HCT, chronic GVHD occurred less frequently after ATG-containing RIC, suggesting a strong GVHD-modulating effect of ATG.
为了研究含抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)的减低强度预处理(RIC)在非血缘(UD)或单倍体相合家庭供者(HFD)造血细胞移植(HCT)中的作用,我们对237例处于缓解期的急性髓系白血病(AML)患者(年龄范围16至69岁)进行了一项2期试验。接受UD-HCT(n = 93)或HFD-HCT(n = 59)的患者接受包含白消安、氟达拉滨和9mg/kg ATG的RIC,而接受同胞全相合供者(MSD,n = 85)HCT的患者接受清髓性白消安和环磷酰胺预处理或上述含4.5mg/kg ATG的RIC。对于移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)预防,给予环孢素和甲氨蝶呤。161例幸存者在HCT后的中位随访期为44.7个月。对于UD-HCT与HFD-HCT,白血病复发、非复发死亡率、无复发生存率、2至4级急性GVHD以及中重度慢性GVHD方面均无显著差异。此外,当将UD-HCT和HFD-HCT的结果合并并与MSD-HCT的结果进行比较时,白血病复发(3年累积发生率,30%对29%)、非复发死亡率(3年累积发生率,7%对8%)、无复发生存率(3年估计值,63%对63%)以及2至4级急性GVHD(120天累积发生率,16%对13%)方面均无显著差异。然而,中重度慢性GVHD在UD/HFD-HCT中发生频率较低(2年累积发生率,22%对40%;P = 0.006)。预处理方案中添加ATG是慢性GVHD较少的显著预测因素(亚分布风险比,0.59)。在处于缓解期的AML中,含ATG的RIC后的UD/HFD-HCT实现了与MSD-HCT相当的白血病控制。尽管UD/HFD-HCT中存在HLA差异,但含ATG的RIC后慢性GVHD发生频率较低,提示ATG具有强大的GVHD调节作用。